找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Essays in Logical Semantics; Johan Benthem Book 1986 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1986 semantic.semantics

[复制链接]
楼主: ONSET
发表于 2025-3-25 04:28:31 | 显示全部楼层
DeterminersN NP ⇒ Det N; involving the notions of .entence, .oun .hrase, .erb .rase, .roper .ame, .terminer and .ommon .oun. In what follows, we shall focus on the Noun Phrases in this scheme. Some of their parts seem to be ‘interpretatively free’, in the sense of allowing any available denotation in a model.
发表于 2025-3-25 10:19:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:39:46 | 显示全部楼层
All Categories be brought to bear upon arbitrary grammatical types: adjectives, connectives, adverbs, etc. To broaden our scope, we will work against the background of an extensional ., with basic types . (‘entity’) and . (‘truth value’) — as in Section 1.1. — allowing formation of functional types (., .) (‘from
发表于 2025-3-25 19:43:21 | 显示全部楼层
Conditionalswitness to this tendency — postponing the well-known puzzles of intensionality. Nevertheless, our investigation is not at all restricted to the extensional realm — and we shall study some central intensional notions in the next two chapters. The first topic is that of ., perhaps the principal concer
发表于 2025-3-25 23:08:06 | 显示全部楼层
Tense And Modalityuantifiers. But the more traditional intensional constructions are rather . on propositions, such as modality or tense. Still, given the generalization made in Chapter 3 to arbitrary extensional categories, a similar move is possible for intensional notions. Instead of pursuing this topic in its ful
发表于 2025-3-26 02:23:47 | 显示全部楼层
Natural Logiclogical artefacts. Thus, the ideal division of labour would come about, with the logician borrowing the linguist’s grammatical analysis in his account of inference, without having to set up his own shop for producing ‘logical forms’. Some strands in this book tend in such a direction — and we shall
发表于 2025-3-26 07:43:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 16:26:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 17:34:31 | 显示全部楼层
The Logic of Semanticsing which invites reflection. For, much clarity is still to be achieved as to the nature of semantic theory, explanation or evidence. One way to proceed here is by general philosophizing, much as in earlier periods. But a more concrete approach is also available at the present stage. There is room f
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-27 04:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表