找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Essay on Liberalism; Looking Left and Rig David F. B. Tucker Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 John Rawls.Robert Noz

[复制链接]
查看: 31336|回复: 49
发表于 2025-3-21 19:19:47 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Essay on Liberalism
副标题Looking Left and Rig
编辑David F. B. Tucker
视频video
丛书名称Nijhoff International Philosophy Series
图书封面Titlebook: Essay on Liberalism; Looking Left and Rig David F. B. Tucker Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 John Rawls.Robert Noz
描述This book offers an introduction to liberal political philosophy, adopting an analytical form of presentation. I consider arguments which inform contemporary debates; by articulating paradigmatic ways of thinking and reviewing competing conceptions of justice and democracy, I hope to present a characterisation of contemporary liberal thought which allows the reader to gauge its potentiality and relevance, and to comprehend in a systematic way some of the many disagreements between liberal writers and the strengths and weaknesses of the claims they make. The reader should also become familiar with the arguments of the most forceful critics of the tradition. The exercise is intended to introduce a way of theorising and my emphasis will be on philosophical analysis and reconstruction. I aim to delineate a variety of intellectual positions in a way that displays their logical coherence. I examine competing conceptions of ‘democracy‘, ‘free speech‘, ‘equality‘ and ‘individualism‘ that inform our political debates in contemporary liberal democracies. These philosophical differences determine many of the policies adopted by governments, for example, whether they forbid racist and pornogra
出版日期Book 1994
关键词John Rawls; Robert Nozick; freedom; ideology; issue; philosophy; political philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1096-9
isbn_softcover978-94-010-4479-0
isbn_ebook978-94-011-1096-9Series ISSN 0924-4530
issn_series 0924-4530
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Essay on Liberalism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Essay on Liberalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Essay on Liberalism网络公开度




书目名称Essay on Liberalism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Essay on Liberalism被引频次




书目名称Essay on Liberalism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Essay on Liberalism年度引用




书目名称Essay on Liberalism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Essay on Liberalism读者反馈




书目名称Essay on Liberalism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:47:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:19:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:56:08 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5802-5All the writers who regard themselves as neo-liberals are thorough-going individualists, yet very few contemporary writers assume Lockean, “possessive individualism” or adopt a humanist approach. Nevertheless, there are some significant writers who do and it is worth examining their positions in detail.
发表于 2025-3-22 10:01:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:44:10 | 显示全部楼层
Monica Corazza,Alessandro BorghiDespite everything said in favour of a liberal approach to political life, there has been sustained dissent by writers who express serious reservations. In this chapter I choose to review the work of two influential critics of liberalism.
发表于 2025-3-22 19:06:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:31:00 | 显示全部楼层
Individualism, Egalitarianism and Rawls,In Chapter TWO we saw how Rawls offers a framework for a liberal theory that combines utilitarian perspectives with various individualist assumptions by appealing to ‘fairness’ as a relevant moral consideration. In this chapter I wish to look at his work in more detail. Let me begin by considering his account of Social Contract.
发表于 2025-3-23 03:29:38 | 显示全部楼层
Arblaster and Unger on Liberalism,Despite everything said in favour of a liberal approach to political life, there has been sustained dissent by writers who express serious reservations. In this chapter I choose to review the work of two influential critics of liberalism.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:25:53 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38340-3mporary debates; by articulating paradigmatic ways of thinking and reviewing competing conceptions of justice and democracy, I hope to present a characterisation of contemporary liberal thought which allows the reader to gauge its potentiality and relevance, and to comprehend in a systematic way som
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 10:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表