找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism; Roots and Prospects Johannes Mierau Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[复制链接]
查看: 55144|回复: 38
发表于 2025-3-21 18:59:43 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism
副标题Roots and Prospects
编辑Johannes Mierau
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/315/314567/314567.mp4
概述Provides the first systematic review of the Structural View on theories.Presents a toolkit for analyzing theories and theory relations.Offers a precisely defined concept for incorporating imprecision
丛书名称Fundamental Theories of Physics
图书封面Titlebook: Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism; Roots and Prospects Johannes Mierau Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus
描述This book offers the first systematic review of the structuralism of physical theories. Particular emphasis is placed on the inclusion of empirical imprecision into formal reconstructions of theories. The proposed measure of imprecision allows for a topological comparison of theories. Considering the ongoing debates on the nature of the thermodynamic limit in statistical mechanics, as well as on limit relations between classical and quantum mechanics, the author asserts that the Bourbaki-style structuralism, together with E. Scheibe‘s theory of reduction, is the best choice for reconstructing and analyzing the related questions of reduction and emergence. Readers will appreciate the critical overview of the main positions in philosophy of science, examined with particular attention to their applicability to current problems of fundamental theories of physics.
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Structuralism of physical theories; Erhard Scheibe; theory reduction; physical theory; limit reduction; a
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25347-8
isbn_softcover978-3-031-25349-2
isbn_ebook978-3-031-25347-8Series ISSN 0168-1222 Series E-ISSN 2365-6425
issn_series 0168-1222
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism网络公开度




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism被引频次




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism年度引用




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism读者反馈




书目名称Erhard Scheibe‘s Structuralism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:58:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic-semantic hybrid view of E. Scheibe.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:17:47 | 显示全部楼层
The Received View of Theories,r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic-semantic hybrid view of E. Scheibe.
发表于 2025-3-22 06:58:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:36:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:51:35 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33570-9r, I retrace a purely syntactic and a semantic phase in the course of its development, and discuss which of its many objections are justified. Despite the untenability of this view, its discussion is an important step to understand the differences to the syntactic view of G. Ludwig and the syntactic
发表于 2025-3-22 17:38:41 | 显示全部楼层
Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxinimportantly ‘structure’ and ‘model’. I compare different ways of defining ‘structure’ (in model theory, as indexed structures, by Bourbakian species of structures and an analogue in category theory) with regard to their claimed language-independence and discuss difficulties that arise when they are
发表于 2025-3-22 21:47:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:27:14 | 显示全部楼层
Dhanya Vijayakumar,Joseph Jankovicrs. It strongly builds on Ludwig’s approach, but it also incorporates Suppes’s central idea to axiomatise theories by set-theoretical predicates. In the second part, I thoroughly examine the formal concept for imprecision ‘admissible blurs’ that has been proposed by Ludwig and adopted by the Munich
发表于 2025-3-23 06:29:48 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-25 13:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表