找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemology versus Ontology; Essays on the Philos P. Dybjer,Sten Lindström,G. Sundholm Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

[复制链接]
查看: 26108|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 18:07:15 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology
副标题Essays on the Philos
编辑P. Dybjer,Sten Lindström,G. Sundholm
视频video
概述Comprehensive overview of the philosophical problems of the foundational framework in current mathematics.Demonstrates the impact of the work of the eminent academic: Per Martin-Löf.Contains contribut
丛书名称Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemology versus Ontology; Essays on the Philos P. Dybjer,Sten Lindström,G. Sundholm Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
描述This book brings together philosophers, mathematicians and logicians to penetrate important problems in the philosophy and foundations of mathematics. In philosophy, one has been concerned with the opposition between constructivism and classical mathematics and the different ontological and epistemological views that are reflected in this opposition. The dominant foundational framework for current mathematics is classical logic and set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC). This framework is, however, laden with philosophical difficulties. One important alternative foundational programme that is actively pursued today is predicativistic constructivism based on Martin-Löf type theory. Associated philosophical foundations are meaning theories in the tradition of Wittgenstein, Dummett, Prawitz and Martin-Löf. What is the relation between proof-theoretical semantics in the tradition of Gentzen, Prawitz, and Martin-Löf and Wittgensteinian or other accounts of meaning-as-use? What can proof-theoretical analyses tell us about the scope and limits of constructive and predicative mathematics?
出版日期Book 2012
关键词Constructive Type Theory; Dummett; Gentzen; Intuitionism; Martin-Löf; Martin-Löf‘s type theory; Mathematic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4435-6
isbn_softcover978-94-017-8238-8
isbn_ebook978-94-007-4435-6Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783
issn_series 2214-9775
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2012
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology网络公开度




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology被引频次




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology读者反馈




书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:02:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:56:15 | 显示全部楼层
,Diphtherie, lobuläre Pneumonie, Scharlach,geometry and, in general, Hilbert’s axiomatic method, but also relativity theory and the so-called method of ideal elements. By drawing upon certain analogies rather than theory-constructions, these ideas affected not only his thinking about mathematics, but also his thinking about language and the nature of philosophy in general.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:34:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 09:16:58 | 显示全部楼层
Wittgenstein’s Diagonal Argument: A Variation on Cantor and Turingr immediately after mentioning Turing, Wittgenstein frames what he calls a “variant” of Cantor’s diagonal proof. We present and assess Wittgenstein’s variant, contending that it forms a distinctive form of proof, and an elaboration rather than a rejection of Turing or Cantor.
发表于 2025-3-22 13:58:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:14:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:15:06 | 显示全部楼层
Ahmed Ghazi,R. Devotini,Domenico Venezianoer logic has categorical characterizations of relevant mathematical structures, while set theory has non-standard models, amounts to no difference at all. Second order logic and set theory permit quite similar categoricity results on one hand, and similar non-standard models on the other hand.
发表于 2025-3-23 01:28:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:58:24 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-11 02:49
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表