Titlebook: Epistemology and Political Philosophy in Gilbert Simondon; Individuation, Techn Andrea Bardin Book 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dor

aggressor

Brocas-Area

Subject and Method of a Philosophy of Individuationions the subject of knowledge as a living being . as a social product through the original concept of the ‘transindividual’, focusing on the psychic and collective processes from which shared significations emerge. Thus he maintains the ontological emergence of the subject and the epistemological me

certain

永久

Infirm

Intervention

Biological, Technical and Social Normativitylores Leroi-Gourhan’s influence on Simondon, particularly relying on . (1943–1945), the work in two volumes that the latter read under the influence of George Canguilhem. It is on the basis of Canguilhem’s idea of a ‘general organology’ and Leroi-Gourhan’s palaeoanthropology that Simondon understand

Hippocampus

Techno-Symbolic Functionof the ‘transindividual’ by way of refuting the phenomenological concept of ‘intersubjectivity’ and the structuralist concept of ‘symbolic system’. In his main oeuvre he describes the transindividual regime of individuation differently from both the way in which the relation ‘to the Other’ (.) is –

发电机

Magic, Technics and Cultureate that a considerable source of Simondon’s philosophy of technics is sociological, and explain how he conceives the symbolic function as essentially ‘techno-symbolic’. Hence two important texts of the 1960s, . (1960–61) and . (1965), can be the key to explore the relationship between religious rit

Chauvinistic

The Mysticism of (Technical) Evolutionin part the cybernetic) technocratic dream. His philosophy draws the line of an irreversible path, and sees the appropriation of technics as a binding necessity: technical ‘openness’ is not for Simondon a simple judgement of value, it is also a palaeoanthropological evidence that – as it is for Berg

暂时过来

Regulation and Invention: Simondon’s Political Philosophy the very ‘existence’ of Simondon’s political thought is quite problematic. I believe Simondon’s philosophy of individuation is better understood as having something actually political .. In fact, Simondon’s political thought is to be looked for in the complex conception of human nature and social p