找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemology I; Peter M. Burkholder Book 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968 epistemology.knowledge.mind.object

[复制链接]
查看: 11815|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 17:29:22 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemology I
编辑Peter M. Burkholder
视频video
丛书名称Tulane Studies in Philosophy
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemology I;  Peter M. Burkholder Book 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968 epistemology.knowledge.mind.object
描述Due to the unprecedented interest which the announcement of the topic of epistemology evoked from contributors, two annual volumes will be devoted to it. This volume accordingly is entitled Epistemology I, and the next volume will be entitled Epistemology II. The Editor KNOWING IN THE STRONG SENSE PETER M. BURKHOLDER Professor Norman Malcolm has defended what he calls "the strong sense" of "know." 1 It is one of the propositional senses; i.e. what is said to be known, in this sense, is an item of information rather than a person, a poem, a physical object, or a skill. According to· Malcolm, this sense of "know" is important and useful.‘ Philosophers have had it "in mind when they have spoken of ‘perfect,‘ ‘metaphysical,‘ or ‘strict‘ cer­ tainty" (Ke, 70). Moreover, laymen use it when they profess to know such obvious truths as "2 + 2 = 4" or "This is an ink-bottle" (said while peering at and poking an ink-bottle). Nevertheless, in spite of his opinion that it is important, Malcolm has not given a detailed analysis of the strong sense of "know." Thus we may be justified in studying it, first to determine exactly what it is, and then to evaluate it. I do not, of course, wish to sugge
出版日期Book 1968
关键词epistemology; knowledge; mind; object
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3441-8
isbn_softcover978-90-247-0291-6
isbn_ebook978-94-010-3441-8
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1968
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemology I影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemology I影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemology I网络公开度




书目名称Epistemology I网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemology I被引频次




书目名称Epistemology I被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemology I年度引用




书目名称Epistemology I年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemology I读者反馈




书目名称Epistemology I读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:01:40 | 显示全部楼层
peering at and poking an ink-bottle). Nevertheless, in spite of his opinion that it is important, Malcolm has not given a detailed analysis of the strong sense of "know." Thus we may be justified in studying it, first to determine exactly what it is, and then to evaluate it. I do not, of course, wish to sugge978-90-247-0291-6978-94-010-3441-8
发表于 2025-3-22 02:46:49 | 显示全部楼层
Knowing in the Strong Sense,n, in this sense, is an item of information rather than a person, a poem, a physical object, or a skill. According to Malcolm, this sense of “know” is important and useful. Philosophers have had it “in mind when they have spoken of ‘perfect’ ‘metaphysical’ or ‘strict’ certainty” (KC, 70). Moreover,
发表于 2025-3-22 08:29:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:10:04 | 显示全部楼层
, and Knowledge,. have experiences categorized as “physical,” “appetitive,” “emotional,” or “non-rational” begun to receive serious philosophical consideration — by existentialists, phenomenologists and metaphysicians of process, all of whom could trace their genesis back to that epochmaking treatise. Nevertheless,
发表于 2025-3-22 15:14:59 | 显示全部楼层
Absent Objects,e knowledge process. No situation is entirely open and this is especially true of problems which are restricted in scope because they carry with them a range of possible solutions. In difficult cases — those which are found in epistemology for instance — it is important for the investigator to know
发表于 2025-3-22 19:47:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:33:48 | 显示全部楼层
Conceptual Models in Knowledge, one would be hard-pressed to find a piece of perceptual knowledge free of all concepts or a piece of conceptual knowledge free of all percepts. Even if one could find perceptual knowledge free of concepts, he could not utter it, for words usually name concepts. With the exception of proper names an
发表于 2025-3-23 04:10:37 | 显示全部楼层
The Analytic, the Synthetic, and C. I. Lewis,ics which cover all supposedly empirical philosophies, the distinction between the a priori, analytic, non-factual statement on the one hand, and the a posteriori, synthetic, factual statement on the other, has recently been taken to offer the most inclusive characteristic of empiricism, being calle
发表于 2025-3-23 07:02:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-9 06:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表