找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs; Deborah K. Heikes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu

[复制链接]
查看: 14427|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 16:23:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs
编辑Deborah K. Heikes
视频video
概述Considers how racist and sexist beliefs can be held to be genuinely undesirable in a world of post-truth and alt-facts.Addresses epistemic involuntarism and whether individuals are responsible for the
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs;  Deborah K. Heikes Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclu
描述This book considers whether we can be epistemically responsible for undesirable beliefs, such as racist and sexist ones. The problem with holding people responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an “undesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities; second, it is not clear what responsibility we have for beliefs .simpliciter.; and third, inherent in discussions of socially constructed ignorance (like white ignorance) is the idea that society is structured in such a way that white people are made deliberately unaware of their ignorance, which suggests their racial beliefs are not epistemically blameworthy.   .This book explores each of these topics with the aim of establishing the nature of undesirable beliefs and our responsibility for these beliefs with the understanding that there may well be (rare) occasions when undesirable beliefs are not epistemically culpable. .
出版日期Book 2023
关键词Involuntarism; Ignorance; Responsibility; Belief; Racism; Sexism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41858-7
isbn_softcover978-3-031-41860-0
isbn_ebook978-3-031-41858-7
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs网络公开度




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs被引频次




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs年度引用




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs读者反馈




书目名称Epistemic Responsibility for Undesirable Beliefs读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:12:45 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2023le responsible for their undesirable beliefs is: first, what constitutes an “undesirable belief” will differ among various epistemic communities; second, it is not clear what responsibility we have for beliefs .simpliciter.; and third, inherent in discussions of socially constructed ignorance (like
发表于 2025-3-22 04:04:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:32:37 | 显示全部楼层
Yuanqing Xia,Mengyin Fu,Peng Shi usually available to us. At times, however, we find ourselves caught within epistemic communities that have limited evidence or that actively exclude outside voices. Does that mean that I can be absolved of responsibility for the influences that affect my beliefs? At times, perhaps, yes. My undesirable beliefs may not be . fault.
发表于 2025-3-22 09:11:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:02:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:40:12 | 显示全部楼层
What Is Undesirable Belief?,emic communities. Furthermore, treating fact and value as inseparable entails that the undesirability of a belief cannot be entirely dictated from outside of the epistemological framework within which that belief is held. Thus, what one epistemic community finds undesirable, another community will f
发表于 2025-3-22 23:58:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:07:16 | 显示全部楼层
What About the Exculpatory Effects of Ignorance?,While a variety of ignorances exist, some ignorance is a socially constructed obfuscatory practice. When this occurs, individuals may not reasonably be expected to know any better—and if we can’t know better, then there is an important sense in which we are not responsible. In systemically racist or
发表于 2025-3-23 05:33:59 | 显示全部楼层
,It’s Not , Fault,s social epistemology, a tension exists between the community and the individual. Epistemic communities are said to be the primary agents of knowledge. So, are . epistemic agents actually responsible for holding undesirable beliefs? This depends on the epistemological dynamic between communities and
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-8 20:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表