找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Paternalism; A Defence Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 auto

[复制链接]
查看: 44433|回复: 39
发表于 2025-3-21 19:04:50 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Epistemic Paternalism
副标题A Defence
编辑Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Epistemic Paternalism; A Defence Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013 auto
描述Any attempt to help us reason in more accurate ways faces a problem: While we acknowledge that others stand to benefit from intellectual advice, each and every one of us tends to consider ourselves an exception, on account of overconfidence. The solution? Accept a form of epistemic paternalism.
出版日期Book 2013
关键词autonomy; bibliography; knowledge; reason
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313171
isbn_softcover978-1-349-34511-3
isbn_ebook978-1-137-31317-1
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Epistemic Paternalism影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism网络公开度




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism被引频次




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism被引频次学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism年度引用




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism年度引用学科排名




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism读者反馈




书目名称Epistemic Paternalism读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:40:47 | 显示全部楼层
B. Breckling,A.-R. Tanha,G. Thiele reliable clairvoyants and disguised mules — it is easy to forget that there is an important sense in which epistemology is an utterly practical discipline. Indeed, according to a long-standing tradition, one of epistemology’s main missions is to provide hands-on advice, aiding the epistemic inquire
发表于 2025-3-22 03:52:28 | 显示全部楼层
Lectures on Mixing and Dynamical Systems,predictable tendencies to reason in ways that lead us to form inaccurate beliefs.. While probably well-worn territory for some philosophers, dwelling for a moment on exactly what does and does not follow from their studies, as well as from the many studies by other psychologists working on questions
发表于 2025-3-22 07:25:18 | 显示全部楼层
Controlled Systems, Controllabilitymic improvement, and that our best bet is to instead impose certain external constraints on information access, collection and evaluation. The purpose of this chapter is to argue that practices involving such external constraints are properly termed .. One of the few previous discussions of epistemi
发表于 2025-3-22 10:15:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:50:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:47:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:39:45 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9934-7ut two jointly sufficient conditions for justified epistemically paternalistic interference, together making up what we referred to as .. In order to defend epistemic paternalism — that is, the idea that someone may be justified in interfering with the inquiry of another for her own epistemic good w
发表于 2025-3-23 03:42:17 | 显示全部楼层
Jin-Liang Wang,Huai-Ning Wu,Shun-Yan Rent remains to be seen, however, if there is some specifically . form of autonomy that is violated through epistemically paternalistic interference, and — if so — whether this gives us any reason not to practise epistemic paternalism. To settle these issues, however, we first need to say something about what epistemic autonomy is.
发表于 2025-3-23 05:47:08 | 显示全部楼层
On the Viability of Epistemic Paternalism: Epistemic Autonomy,t remains to be seen, however, if there is some specifically . form of autonomy that is violated through epistemically paternalistic interference, and — if so — whether this gives us any reason not to practise epistemic paternalism. To settle these issues, however, we first need to say something about what epistemic autonomy is.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-10 09:14
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表