Titlebook: Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union; Protecting Public an Mitchell P. Smith Book 2012 Mitchell

尤指植物

书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union网络公开度




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union被引频次




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union被引频次学科排名




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union年度引用




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union年度引用学科排名




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union读者反馈




书目名称Environmental and Health Regulation in the United States and the European Union读者反馈学科排名

丰满有漂亮

Chemicals Regulation: Courts Rule in the United States; Industry Ascendant in the EU,porary chemicals regulation not only in the European Union (EU), but in the United States as well. Second, court decisions imposing extraordinary demands on regulatory authority have been a pivotal element of the erosion of regulatory rigor in the United States. Third, while EU institutional structu

Aids209

玛瑙

,Recycling of End-of-Life Vehicles: “Good Product Stewardship” in the United States; Producer Pays iion, that of “good product stewardship,” calls upon not only producers, but all actors associated with production and consumption, to share responsibility for the safe, environmentally friendly disposal of the products they handle (Toffel, 2002). In contrast, regulation developed in the EU dating ba

Obligatory

遭受

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3870-4 is true of regulation of reuse and recycling of end-of-life products including autos and electronic components, of potentially hazardous chemicals, and of health claims on food labels. Coincidentally, the European Union (EU) gravitated toward more restrictive regulation in these very same areas, es

遭受

S. Ikezawa,M. Wakamatsu,T. Uedaporary chemicals regulation not only in the European Union (EU), but in the United States as well. Second, court decisions imposing extraordinary demands on regulatory authority have been a pivotal element of the erosion of regulatory rigor in the United States. Third, while EU institutional structu

Canary

Cerebral Stroke: An Introduction,ited States reflects a cautious and highly restrictive approach. This approach only began to unravel in the opening years of the twenty-first century, and regulation has become progressively more permissive since. In addition, this chapter echoes the findings of chapter 2 that, in the European Union

推测

otic-capsule