Titlebook: Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose; Umberto Albarella Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001 Earth Science.archae

文化修养

书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose网络公开度




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose被引频次




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose被引频次学科排名




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose年度引用




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose年度引用学科排名




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose读者反馈




书目名称Environmental Archaeology: Meaning and Purpose读者反馈学科排名

变白

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230597914 few years of working to build on the common ground between archaeology and environmentalism, I have come to the view that our interests are largely one and the same. This, I would emphasise, is not simply a political point, but goes to the heart of what archaeology is. In what follows I will try to make clear why this is the case.

围巾

Environmental Archaeology is Dead: Long Live Bioarchaeology, Geoarchaeology and Human Palaeoecologysked so very politely — but insistently — by the editor to write a brief commentary on Jonathan Driver’s provocative article on the nature of environmental archaeology, I am resolved to try to do my best — and my briefest.

金哥占卜者

Melanocytes

Watemelon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-24666-5I am grateful that Umberto Albarella sought a reaction to my contribution from Yannis Hamilakis, and to Yannis for responding with vigour and in detail. The discussion between us could run and run, and I must limit myself here to a few comments.

Watemelon

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-9651-6This paper looks at the sources of funding for archaeology. It finds that a large proportion of funding derives from developments that have detrimental effects on nature. This can present a moral dilemma for practising archaeologists. Suggestions on possible ways forward are presented.

TOXIN

Whose Dichotomy is it Anyway?I am grateful that Umberto Albarella sought a reaction to my contribution from Yannis Hamilakis, and to Yannis for responding with vigour and in detail. The discussion between us could run and run, and I must limit myself here to a few comments.

泄露

The Responsibilities of Archaeologists to Nature ConservationThis paper looks at the sources of funding for archaeology. It finds that a large proportion of funding derives from developments that have detrimental effects on nature. This can present a moral dilemma for practising archaeologists. Suggestions on possible ways forward are presented.

修正案