找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Environment and Society; Concepts and Challen Magnus Boström,Debra J. Davidson Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

[复制链接]
楼主: Stubborn
发表于 2025-3-28 15:47:39 | 显示全部楼层
Institutions and National Organizationsal sciences and technical risk analysis. This cross-fertilization enhances an in-depth understanding of risks and resilience. It is argued herein that it is fruitful to see the concepts as complementary and to exploit both of them in analyses of the environment and society.
发表于 2025-3-28 19:33:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 00:07:27 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/b112400epts and practices for valuing natural resources. The chapter concludes by highlighting the way that pricing and market-making have changed the character of environmental governance, introducing new kinds of actor and incentives which social scientists need to study.
发表于 2025-3-29 03:45:08 | 显示全部楼层
‘Workshop on Nuclear Forces, May 1985’e in constant dialogue with structural arrangements. This chapter provides commentary on the limitations of the individualistic approach, an overview of how social practice theory is an improved conceptualization of sustainable consumption, and argues that social practice theory can rejuvenate environmental political discourse.
发表于 2025-3-29 09:49:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 14:32:55 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47912-4ions for existing patterns, and divergent policy approaches for addressing the issue. As it heads to the end of its fourth decade, environmental justice research has a vast open agenda with great promise, both within national and local realms, and at the international level as well.
发表于 2025-3-29 16:59:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 22:08:42 | 显示全部楼层
f social-ecological systems propose, is often inappropriate because of cross-scale socio-political dynamics. Given the importance of global flows, we argue that place-based or landscape approaches that bring together local ecosystem management and global value chains present an ambivalent, but highly relevant spatial framing.
发表于 2025-3-30 02:44:59 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 06:46:56 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction: Conceptualizing Environment-Society Relations,planatory power; social, cultural, or geo-political ‘biases’ and ‘blinders’; and the action-potential implicated by the concepts. It introduces a set of conceptual traps that scholars ought to avoid when theorizing on environment-society relations. Finally it introduces the concepts scrutinized in the book.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-25 10:46
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表