Titlebook: Environment and Behavior; A Dynamic Perspectiv Charles J. Holahan Book 1978 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1978 behavior.ecology.

军械库

Sex Differences in Schematizing the Behavioral Environmenta particular individual. Though the emerging discipline of environmental psychology (Craik, 1970; Proshansky, Ittelson, & Rivlin, 1970; Wohlwill, 1970) has generated a renewed psychological interest in the molar physical environment, little attention has been addressed to the behavioral or phenomenological environment.

justify

Implications for the Field of Environment and Behaviorative questions to be posed, the kinds of data to be sought, and the nature of the research answers that will be deemed acceptable. Ittelson, Franck, and O’Hanlon (1976) have eloquently articulated the relevance of this concern to the study of environment and behavior:

灯泡

舰旗

表主动

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919885ment is misleading, for in its compelling simplicity there is implicit an assumption that the effect of environment on behavior is direct, passive, simple, and readily predictable. Nothing could be further from the truth.

PLE

憎恶

LVAD360

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101449ative questions to be posed, the kinds of data to be sought, and the nature of the research answers that will be deemed acceptable. Ittelson, Franck, and O’Hanlon (1976) have eloquently articulated the relevance of this concern to the study of environment and behavior:

让步

Mary McAleer Balkun,Susan C. Imbarrato Yancy, 1971). Newman (1972) has recently documented the consistent relationship between low social cohesion and high crime level typical in high-rise public housing. Gans (1962) has concluded that too often the physical changes of urban renewal fail to substantially improve the lives of the poor.

Override

Industrial Profiles and Industrial Mobility,crowding in dormitory settings has been shown to relate to increased stress along with decreased social contact (Valins & Baum, 1973), more negative ratings of living space (Eoyang, 1974), and more negative interpersonal attitudes (Baron, Mandel, Adams, & Griffen, 1976).