Titlebook: Engineering for Extremes; Decision-Making in a Mark G. Stewart,David V. Rosowsky Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

创造性

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244962ward risk-informed design, with its formal tools for analyzing uncertainties and consequences of damage or failures in the built environment, promises a level of coherence in decision-making that cannot be achieved by judgment alone, and increases the likelihood that judgements, when necessary, are

完成才能战胜

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230507975tion to over 96%. The benefit-to-cost ratio of the measure is high at 5.1, and it remains cost effective even if risk reduction is halved and costs are doubled. On the other hand the expensive Federal Air Marshal Service fails a cost–benefit analysis, whereas the Federal Flight Deck Officer program

骇人

灯泡

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4152-3performance-based design, grid recovery planning, and hardening decisions in preparation for extreme events. The present study establishes a set of performance-based limit states for lattice transmission towers subject to wind-induced extreme loadings. Specifically, five damage states including no d

清楚说话

五行打油诗

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9483-9ges on building resilience and advancing sustainable development in the cryosphere regions. In this chapter, we briefly introduce the cryosphere change and their impact on the services, as well as risks arising from the hazards in response to global warming. To adapt to the changing services and mit

insincerity

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-861-3s, and the change in risk profile in aggregate as a result. Of course, increasingly owners are turning towards gaining more data from their assets using Structural Health Monitoring to support decision-making. Therefore we discuss how its benefits as a decision-making support tool can be assessed us

DRILL

David P. Bazett-Jones,Graham Dellaireof strengthening structures to withstand loss of load-bearing elements. We show how this decision is rooted on the probability of losing the load-bearing element, which should be the result of a risk analysis addressing a structure’s adjacency, ownership and intended use. We also discuss how this de

constitutional

Horizon

Risks and Compromises: Principled Compromises in Managing Societal Risks of Extreme Eventsand scope in this complex process of risk analysis, risk communication, and risk perception. The proposed guidelines can support decision-makers in making more informed and more transparent decisions about safety, sustainability, and resilience.