找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes; William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 20

[复制链接]
查看: 51092|回复: 36
发表于 2025-3-21 17:24:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes
编辑William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley
视频video
概述Presents a comprehensive overview of the theory of voting paradoxes.Studies voting procedures with regard to their likelihood of actually observing paradoxical election outcome.Validates the theoretic
丛书名称Studies in Choice and Welfare
图书封面Titlebook: Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes;  William V. Gehrlein,Dominique Lepelley Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 20
描述This monograph studies voting procedures based on the probability that paradoxical outcomes like the famous Condorcet Paradox might exist. It is well known that hypothetical examples of many different paradoxical election outcomes can be developed, but this analysis examines factors that are related to the process by which voters form their preferences on candidates that will significantly reduce the likelihood that such voting paradoxes will ever actually be observed. It is found that extreme forms of voting paradoxes should be uncommon events with a small number of candidates. Another consideration is the propensity of common voting rules to elect the Condorcet Winner, which is widely accepted as the best choice as the winner, when it exists. All common voting rules are found to have identifiable scenarios for which they perform well on the basis of this criterion. But, Borda Rule is found to consistently work well at electing the Condorcet Winner, while the other voting rules have scenarios where they work poorly or have a very small likelihood of electing a different candidate than Borda Rule. The conclusions of previous theoretical work are presented in an expository format an
出版日期Book 2017
关键词Voting; Voting rules; Elections; Election procedures; Social choice; Condorcet‘s Paradox; Voting paradox; V
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64659-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87845-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-64659-6Series ISSN 1614-0311 Series E-ISSN 2197-8530
issn_series 1614-0311
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes网络公开度




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes被引频次




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes被引频次学科排名




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes年度引用




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes年度引用学科排名




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes读者反馈




书目名称Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:15:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:39:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:57:18 | 显示全部楼层
Two-Stage Election Procedures,orcet Efficiency. Theoretical analysis shows that the Condorcet Efficiency of these two-stage voting rules consistently marginally dominate Borda Rule as the various measures of group mutual coherence change. However, it is also found that the probability that either of the two-stage rules will elec
发表于 2025-3-22 11:56:42 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:23:14 | 显示全部楼层
Other Voting Rules and Considerations,voting, since it is a frequently held belief that Borda Rule is particularly susceptible to manipulation. A careful investigation shows that the validity of this perception does not hold up under scrutiny. A voting rule that has recently received a lot of attention is also analyzed; the Three-valued
发表于 2025-3-22 20:38:18 | 显示全部楼层
Green Infrastructure to Pursue Two Visionsof dependence among voters’ preferences will reduce the probability of observing paradoxes and changing the degree of homogeneity among voters’ preferences will also predictably alter their likelihoods.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:31:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:34:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:51:44 | 显示全部楼层
,Measures of Agreement in Voters’ Preferences,consistent relationship is found to exist for those models that are based on group mutual coherence that assume that voters can mutually agree on an underlying ordering of candidates along a common dimension.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 06:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表