找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Efficacy Analysis in Clinical Trials an Update; Efficacy Analysis in Ton J. Cleophas,Aeilko H. Zwinderman Textbook 2019 Springer Nature Swi

[复制链接]
楼主: 富裕
发表于 2025-3-23 10:12:02 | 显示全部楼层
Ensembled-Correlations for Efficacy Analysis,he help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.simple linear regressions,.multiple linear regressions,.Bonferroni’s adjustments..Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of ensembled-correlation methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.
发表于 2025-3-23 17:40:00 | 显示全部楼层
Gamma-Distributions for Efficacy Analysis,lp of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.simple linear regressions,.multiple linear regressions,.Bonferroni’s adjustments..Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of gamma-distribution methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.
发表于 2025-3-23 21:57:11 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6134-1ses of variance, both paired and unpaired, are explained as methods for testing the significance of difference between a new and control treatment. Instead of treatment modalities as causal outcome factors, many more causal factors of health and sickness can be tested in clinical trials, like psycho
发表于 2025-3-23 22:59:55 | 显示全部楼层
Demanding Energy: An Introduction,ms on drug efficacy scores was tested, both traditionally and with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of optimal-scaling methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more info
发表于 2025-3-24 06:17:52 | 显示全部楼层
A Shared (Cost) Burden (Pillar Three), and with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis was consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of ratio-statistic methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.
发表于 2025-3-24 08:16:03 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78809-6achine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of complex-samples methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.
发表于 2025-3-24 13:34:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 17:02:36 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6805-6d with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis was composed of.Poisson statistics,.z-tests..Machine learning efficacy analysis was composed of evolutionary-operation methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.
发表于 2025-3-24 20:26:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 01:20:10 | 显示全部楼层
Daria Smirnova,Tatiana Smirnova,Paul Cummingnalysis was composed of.discretization of continuous predictors,.three dimensional bars of effects versus outcome,.crosstabs with chi-square statistics..Machine learning efficacy analysis was composed of high-risk-bin methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 13:45
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表