Titlebook: Effective Multilateralism; Through the Looking Jochen Prantl (Associate Professor in Internationa Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

Accord

progestin

Formalizing Informal Cooperation?p that Washington enjoys with Singapore rather than with formal ally Japan? Are we wise to pin any hope whatsoever on the quest for formal binding targets on carbon emissions as opposed to the possibility of informal, and even tacit or non-negotiated, understandings between at least some of the majo

品尝你的人

Selective or Effective Multilateralism? The Bush Administration’s Proliferation Security Initiative s. Furthermore, for those concerned with maintaining a United States or other major state commitment to multilateral institutions — either to soften the impact of dominance, constrain unilateralist impulses or help legitimate policy positions — these informal institutions are also worthy of support.

AVID

The Mismanagement of Global Imbalances: Why Did Multilateralism Fail? they played little role in producing the crisis, there are a variety of other reasons why they should remain high on the agenda of global economic governance. Not least, continuing large payments imbalances raise concerns about the consequences of the growing net indebtedness of the United States a

GRE

Jochen Prantl (Associate Professor in Internationa

培养

压倒

Elkedagmar Heinrich,Hans-Dieter Janetzkohe early 2000s, multilateralism was frequently viewed through the prism of US hegemony. Now, the picture is one of flux, fluidity and great uncertainty. This chapter seeks to shed light on some of the principal features of the contemporary global order and some of the major sources of this uncertainty.

神秘

卵石

2633-5964 tion. These assumptions are no longer justified. Effective Multilateralism makes the case for a new approach to explaining international cooperation through the lens of East Asian.978-1-349-33488-9978-1-137-31298-3Series ISSN 2633-5964 Series E-ISSN 2633-5972

和谐

Das Mikroskop und seine Anwendungate change as a governance issue focuses attention upon the importance of reflexive, inclusive and flexible decision-making. It also underscores the role of leadership and institutions (both formal and informal) that, in turn, raise questions about the locus of authority as well as normative concerns over equity and justice.