找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Eastern Christian Approaches to Philosophy; James Siemens,Joshua Matthan Brown Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[复制链接]
楼主: hierarchy
发表于 2025-3-25 04:26:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 09:29:39 | 显示全部楼层
Hans-Martin Füssel,Mikael Hildénf the Eastern Christian tradition to offer an original response to contemporary critiques of the doctrine of divine impassibility. He does this by exploring two key thinkers, Origen of Alexandria and Gregory Thaumaturgus, and bringing a nuanced discussion of their concept of impassibility into conversation with contemporary philosophy of religion.
发表于 2025-3-25 13:44:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:10:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:09:38 | 显示全部楼层
Divine Impassibility in Eastern Patristic Thought: Origen of Alexandria and Gregory Thaumaturgusf the Eastern Christian tradition to offer an original response to contemporary critiques of the doctrine of divine impassibility. He does this by exploring two key thinkers, Origen of Alexandria and Gregory Thaumaturgus, and bringing a nuanced discussion of their concept of impassibility into conversation with contemporary philosophy of religion.
发表于 2025-3-26 02:58:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 06:00:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:19:23 | 显示全部楼层
St Ephrem and the Pursuit of Wisdomm or .. He shows that, despite some of his criticisms of Greek thought, St Ephrem heavily engaged with, reacted to, and borrowed from many ideas and themes found in late antique philosophy. He accomplishes this by analysing St Ephrem’s understanding of the purpose of cognitive activity and showing t
发表于 2025-3-26 14:43:50 | 显示全部楼层
The Emergence of the Scholastic Attitude Towards Philosophy in Greek Patristic Thoughtg that the Scholastic stance towards the relationship between philosophy and theology was already at work informing the Christological debates of the sixth century that took place in the Eastern part of Christendom. Specifically, she demonstrates that the distinctive features of Scholastic philosoph
发表于 2025-3-26 16:51:34 | 显示全部楼层
What We Can and Cannot Say: An Apophatic Response to Atheism of God endorsed by Eastern Christian thinkers. He maintains that the most powerful and economical response to contemporary arguments for atheism is to reject theistic personalism and adopt apophatic theism. Apophatic theists believe there is a lot we . say about God, taking the divine nature to be
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-24 18:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表