找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy; Cecilia Muratori,Gianni Paganini Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzer

[复制链接]
查看: 29352|回复: 56
发表于 2025-3-21 16:59:58 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy
编辑Cecilia Muratori,Gianni Paganini
视频video
概述Argues that an abrupt boundary should not divide the historiography of Renaissance and Early Modern philosophies.Details the methodological instruments for a new approach to the study of history of ph
丛书名称International Archives of the History of Ideas‘ Archives internationales d‘histoire des idées
图书封面Titlebook: Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy;  Cecilia Muratori,Gianni Paganini Book 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzer
描述.When does Renaissance philosophy end, and Early Modern philosophy begin? Do Renaissance philosophers have something in common, which distinguishes them from Early Modern philosophers? And ultimately, what defines the modernity of the Early Modern period, and what role did the Renaissance play in shaping it? The answers to these questions are not just chronological. This book challenges traditional constructions of these periods, which partly reflect the prejudice that the Renaissance was a literary and artistic phenomenon, rather than a philosophical phase..The essays in this book investigate how the legacy of Renaissance philosophers persisted in the following centuries through the direct encounters of subsequent generations with Renaissance philosophical texts. This volume treats Early Modern philosophers as joining their predecessors as ‘conversation partners’: the ‘conversations’ in this book feature, among others, Girolamo Cardano and Henry More, Thomas Hobbes and Lorenzo Valla, Bernardino Telesio and Francis Bacon, René Descartes and Tommaso Campanella, Giulio Cesare Vanini and the anonymous .Theophrastus redivivus..
出版日期Book 2016
关键词Early Modern political thought; History of Philosophical Historiography; Italian renaissance; Natural p
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32604-7
isbn_softcover978-3-319-81325-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-32604-7Series ISSN 0066-6610 Series E-ISSN 2215-0307
issn_series 0066-6610
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy网络公开度




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy被引频次




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy被引频次学科排名




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy年度引用




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy年度引用学科排名




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy读者反馈




书目名称Early Modern Philosophers and the Renaissance Legacy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:16:32 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:50:53 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-313-8424-2. to a diminutive collection of Platonic commonplaces by Niccolò Liburnio, Burton’s work makes it clear that a history of the reception of Platonism in the seventeenth century needs to consider the various milieux of European general scholarship.
发表于 2025-3-22 05:14:05 | 显示全部楼层
Alexis Lo,Michael James,Ian K. Y. Lots, making him guilty of heterodoxy and atheism. More sought to expose Cardano’s errors by means of the same strategy used in the case of Hobbes: by using his adversary’s own method of argument. He drew on modern philosophy (Cartesianism) to dispel the obscurantism and misbelief in Cardano, which he links to the atheism of Pomponazzi and Vanini.
发表于 2025-3-22 12:03:20 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7603-2servation, for his criticism of the classic and Renaissance concept of “glory”, Hobbes reveals himself to have been influenced much more by Valla’s similar topics than by Aristotle’s approach, as Leo Strauss in the past and more recently Boonin-Vail and Ewin thought.
发表于 2025-3-22 14:24:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:23:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:13:49 | 显示全部楼层
Thomas Hobbes Against the Aristotelian Account of the Virtues and His Renaissance Source Lorenzo Valservation, for his criticism of the classic and Renaissance concept of “glory”, Hobbes reveals himself to have been influenced much more by Valla’s similar topics than by Aristotle’s approach, as Leo Strauss in the past and more recently Boonin-Vail and Ewin thought.
发表于 2025-3-23 04:55:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 06:25:20 | 显示全部楼层
The Return of Campanella: La Forge versus Cureau de la Chambrey of a form of knowledge in organic events, Cureau was answering to a problem raised by Campanella in his .. La Forge’s contention that no knowledge is required to explain nature is addressed against the permanence of Renaissance vitalism in the name of the original inspiration of Cartesian new science.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 06:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表