找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: EU Criminal Justice; Fundamental Rights, Tommaso Rafaraci,Rosanna Belfiore Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 EU criminal law a

[复制链接]
楼主: fumble
发表于 2025-3-28 15:54:13 | 显示全部楼层
Defence Areas and Limits in the Investigations of the European Public Prosecutorhe provisions from which a guarantee statute can be extracted for those who will be subject to investigation and actions by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Author concludes with an altogether positive assessment about the defence statute before the European Public Prosecutor’s Office bu
发表于 2025-3-28 19:45:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 01:07:33 | 显示全部楼层
Fair Trial Rights in the European Union: Reconciling Accused and Victims’ Rightsready guaranteed by the ECtHR? How do these rights compete or balance with the rights given the victims? This paper brings all these developments together and sketches the steps towards building up the rights-component of European criminal law.
发表于 2025-3-29 03:42:28 | 显示全部楼层
The Right of Access to a Lawyer in the European Union: Directive 2013/48/EU and Its Implementation iinimum standards on the rights, support and protection of the victims of crime, the EU adopted different measures on the minimum procedural rights of defendants. In this paper, the Author focusses her attention on Directive 2013/48/EU, 22 October 2013, on the right of access to a lawyer and its implementation into the Spanish legal system.
发表于 2025-3-29 10:32:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 14:03:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 17:39:36 | 显示全部楼层
on the other, no effective remedies have been introduced in criminal proceedings. The result is the Italian judiciary seems not to have recognised the reform’s importance by continuing the restrictive interpretation of the right to linguistic assistance.
发表于 2025-3-29 23:45:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 03:58:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 07:04:11 | 显示全部楼层
Die Transportschicht des Internets,urt. This paper, however, argues that judicial control of a Union institution should be exercised by a Union court and that the treaty system of judicial protection does not allow for a delegation of jurisdiction to national courts.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-17 09:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表