找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science; Vassilios Karakostas,Dennis Dieks Conference proceedings 2013 Spri

[复制链接]
查看: 55298|回复: 52
发表于 2025-3-21 18:32:53 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science
编辑Vassilios Karakostas,Dennis Dieks
视频video
概述Presents the proceedings to the third European Philosophy of Science Association.Offers new developments in philosophy of science.Provides a thematic approach to the topic?
丛书名称The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings
图书封面Titlebook: EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science;  Vassilios Karakostas,Dennis Dieks Conference proceedings 2013 Spri
描述.This book contains a selection of original conference papers covering all major fields in the philosophy of science, that have been organized into themes. The first section of this volume begins with the formal philosophy of science, moves on to idealization, representation and explanation and then finishes with realism, anti-realism and special science laws. The second section covers the philosophy of the physical sciences, looking at quantum mechanics, spontaneous symmetry breaking, the philosophy of space and time, linking physics and metaphysics and the philosophy of chemistry.   .Further themed sections cover the philosophies of the life sciences, the cognitive sciences and the social sciences. Readers will find that this volume provides an excellent overview of the state of the art in the philosophy of science, as practiced in different European countries. ​.
出版日期Conference proceedings 2013
关键词Constitutive mechanistic explanations; Correlation and truth; Deflationism on Scientific Representatio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0
isbn_softcover978-3-319-34703-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-01306-0
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science网络公开度




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science被引频次




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science年度引用




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science读者反馈




书目名称EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

1票 100.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:50:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:58:24 | 显示全部楼层
Intuitionistic Semantics for Fitch’s Paradox no threat to the antirealist. However, the semantics become intolerably inexpressive. On the other hand, if one interprets ¬Kp as saying that Kp is untrue ., another way-out of the paradox presents itself. I sketch which one this is, and I describe the intuitionistic models, in which it can be appl
发表于 2025-3-22 05:27:41 | 显示全部楼层
Correlation and Truth in terms of probabilities. This paper discusses one particularly simple correlation measure which is highly significant for almost any such attempt within the philosophy of science or epistemology. In particular, it shows how this correlation measure is related to central attempts to capture essent
发表于 2025-3-22 12:06:40 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:09:07 | 显示全部楼层
How Organization Explainspulability criterion for constitutive relevance only captures the explanatory relevance of causal properties of parts and leaves the organization side of mechanistic explanation unaccounted for. We use the contrastive counterfactual theory of explanation and an account of the dimensions of organizat
发表于 2025-3-22 20:20:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:20:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 04:27:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:41:01 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 01:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表