Titlebook: EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009; Henk W. de Regt,Stephan Hartmann,Samir Okasha Conference proceedings 2012 Springer Netherlands

沉思的鱼

Encephalitis

(Type-D) are descriptive empirical hypotheses regarding the nature of scientific inquiry. The second (Type-E) are epistemological theories about what individuals (scientists or non-scientists) should/can justifiably believe about (successful) scientific theories. Favoring (variants of) the realist T

Infelicity

Proponent

金桌活画面

Sustaining a Rational Disagreement, social epistemologists hold that the answer is negative. We point to considerations from the history of science that favor rather the opposite answer. However, we also explain how the other position can appear intuitively attractive.

使增至最大

Optic-Disk

The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedingshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/300473.jpg

天空

Modeling Strategies for Measuring Phenomena In- and Outside the Laboratory,that is, the assumption of the appearance of something without having its structure. Or to put it briefly: It will be shown that outside the laboratory, models used for measurement aims are simulations.

神圣将军

Modeling Scientific Evidence: The Challenge of Specifying Likelihoods,nt approach to confirmation and his response to these challenges. I argue that while Sober makes real progress, neither challenge is completely overcome. The specification challenge is particularly difficult, undermining the general argument that the law of likelihood provides a more objective model of confirmation.

Keratin