Titlebook: Dissoi Logoi: Introduction, Critical Text, Translation, and Commentary; Sebastiano Molinelli Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

Germinate

Defining . Among Pyrrhonists, . is likely to have been studied by Aenesidemus, to have been commented on by Zeuxis, and to have worked as a source for Sextus Empiricus, which contributes to explaining the collocation of this text at the end of Sextus’ codices.

Largess

Structural Commentarysion is that between the antilogic form of chs. 1–6 and the monologic of chs. 7–9. A second one concerns the antilogies of chs. 1–5 and that of ch. 6. Then, chs. 1–4—which, properly speaking, are the true δισσοὶ λόγοι—stand out for their common logic. Lastly, chs. 1–3 offer the best expression of sophistic moral relativism.

富足女人

耐寒

Defining y of its author, its sources and its reception in antiquity. Contrary to the standard view of the work as the collection of lecture-notes made by a Doric-speaking sophist around 403–395 BCE, . appears to have been written between 355 and 338, in an Eastern form of Doric κοινή, by a sophist who aimed

干旱

GLEAN

不如屎壳郎

Folklore

faucet

Flirtatious

This second commentary delves into each of the nine . chapters, providing a synopsis of it and examining its most salient lemmas from a textual, linguistic, literary, historical, rhetorical, and philosophical point of view.