Titlebook: Designs for Language Program Evaluation; Paul Gruba Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to

engender

uss how to conduct an evaluation of a Chinese heritage language program in ways that recognize stakeholder agency and community ownership of the language program. The chapter concludes with a call to see communities as diverse, multilayered and sensitive to cultural practices.

JAMB

ertens and Wilson (2019). A review of the literature explores ‘principles’ as a basis for language learning, program strategy, and an evaluand. The illustrative case study looks at the challenges of evaluation for a small community-funded language and literacy program for asylum seekers and refugees in urban Australia.

hallow

nt, evaluation, and work in digital environments.Provides a This book aims to advance language program evaluation and practice, building on the author‘s previous work in .Blended Language Program Evaluation. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016). The book is based in theory, yet incorporates case study example

Alveolar-Bone

Situating Language Program Evaluation,ts history, and suggests an agenda for further development. Importantly, we then draw on the transdisciplinary nature of applied linguistics to argue for a greater integration of mainstream program evaluation to spur the development of our field.

地名表

miniature

evaculate

Paul GrubaEvidence-based, practical and reader-friendly guide to contemporary theory and practice.Grounded in years of experience in language assessment, evaluation, and work in digital environments.Provides a

熄灭

http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/284593.jpg

Canvas

luation draws on a range of influences. In this chapter, we situate language program evaluation to provide a sense of the history and context that continues to inform work to date. Throughout the chapter, we interweave concepts from Norris (2016) who defines language program evaluation, summarizes i

adjacent

on, ‘being a program evaluator’ is a relatively unusual role that many people associate with punitive actions. To develop, it is important to understand how our own experiences inform the work, what evaluators do, how they think, and how contemporary professional evaluators strive to be more compete