找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Drafting the EU Charter; Rights, Legitimacy a Justus Schönlau Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

[复制链接]
查看: 7732|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:56:36 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Drafting the EU Charter
副标题Rights, Legitimacy a
编辑Justus Schönlau
视频video
丛书名称Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics
图书封面Titlebook: Drafting the EU Charter; Rights, Legitimacy a Justus Schönlau Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005
描述This book gives a comprehensive account of the drafting of the EU Charter in the first Convention and shows the important contribution of this process to the constitutional development of the European Union. By drawing on a body of empirical data from the Convention in 1999-2000 it shows how the debates about a catalogue of fundamental rights for the EU prior to enlargement triggered a much wider discussion about the basis and basics of European integration. Thus it can shed new light on the EU‘s ongoing search for legitimacy.
出版日期Book 2005
关键词constitution; desegregation; European Integration; European Union; European Union (EU); fundamental right
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513495
isbn_softcover978-1-349-54416-5
isbn_ebook978-0-230-51349-5Series ISSN 2662-5873 Series E-ISSN 2662-5881
issn_series 2662-5873
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Drafting the EU Charter影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter网络公开度




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter被引频次




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter被引频次学科排名




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter年度引用




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter年度引用学科排名




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter读者反馈




书目名称Drafting the EU Charter读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:49:28 | 显示全部楼层
Legitimacy and Fundamental Rights,eans (see also Chapter 3). One problem in this exercise, however, was the apparent failure by the authors of the Cologne mandate to recognise how much political dynamite was contained in their proposal. The EU was a complex of overlapping systems of rights, and rights protection, both legally and po
发表于 2025-3-22 02:15:33 | 显示全部楼层
Drafting the Charter in the Convention, state or government). The Charter Convention not only broadened and publicised this debate, but it also found a number of new solutions to old problems, and most importantly established the Convention method as a new tool for debating issues of ‘constitutional’ significance for the EU.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:49:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:08:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:06:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:44:05 | 显示全部楼层
Testing with the Windows Registry state or government). The Charter Convention not only broadened and publicised this debate, but it also found a number of new solutions to old problems, and most importantly established the Convention method as a new tool for debating issues of ‘constitutional’ significance for the EU.
发表于 2025-3-23 00:17:31 | 显示全部楼层
Exact symbolic models for verificationU? What should it do for whom? How can it act effectively and efficiently? How can it involve its people in the processes of decision-making? Satisfactory answers to all these questions at every given stage of integration are indispensable if the Union and its activities are to be acceptable to its
发表于 2025-3-23 01:29:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:27:18 | 显示全部楼层
Legitimacy and Fundamental Rights,rtain rights and the legitimacy of the European Union.. Paul Craig expressed a similar view when he stated that ‘[t]he most obvious reason’ for the EU to develop its own regime of fundamental rights protection ‘is that it enhances the Community’s legitimacy … The greater the powers of the Community,
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-14 21:59
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表