Titlebook: Doing Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: A Case Study of the Origin of Genetics; Yafeng Shan Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerl

Range-Of-Motion

Pelago

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50617-9Conceptual Change; Kuhn’s Legacy; Origins of Genetics; Scientific Change; Scientific Progress; Mendel; Men

chandel

978-3-030-50619-3Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

蚊帐

Yafeng ShanRevisits the history of early genetics.Develops the exemplar-based approach to the development of science.Introduces new accounts of conceptual change, evidential practice, and theory choice

burnish

apiary

Introduction,has been constantly challenged and questioned. Nevertheless, substantial hope for HPS as a productive academic discipline is not dead. Some historically-minded philosophers of science and philosophically-minded historians of science never stop making efforts to promote the dialogue across the bounda

改变

Mendel’s Pisum Revisitede problem of heredity. It is now a consensus that Mendel’s concern, literally speaking, was about the development of hybrids in their progeny. However, there is no consensus on what Mendel meant by development (.). Nor is there an agreement on the interpretation of Mendel’s laws of developmental ser

Flavouring

De Vries’ Mendelism Reassessedever, there is still lack of a systematic evaluation of de Vries’ incorporation. It is unclear in what sense de Vries’ incorporation was significant for the origin of genetics. Nor is it very clear what role Mendel’s work played in de Vries’ incorporation. Would there have been a Mendelian theory of

龙卷风

Weldon’s Choice Reconsideredf heredity in the first decade of the twentieth century. Accordingly, the examinations of Weldon’s work are typically framed within the context of the Mendelian-Biometrician controversy. This chapter revisits the significance of Weldon’s work in the history of genetics by examining Weldon’s view on

衰老

Exemplarising the Origin of Genetics in what sense? What was Mendel’s contribution to the origin of genetics? What role did Mendel’s work play in the “rediscovery” in 1900? What was the contribution made by the “rediscoverers” to the origin of genetics? What is a best way to analyse and interpret the origin of genetics, from a philoso