书目名称 | Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications? | 编辑 | Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt | 视频video | | 概述 | The only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co | 丛书名称 | The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology | 图书封面 |  | 描述 | .This book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neurosciencecan, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific .is .to normative ethical .ought .can be quite frau | 出版日期 | Book 2020 | 关键词 | neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; mora | 版次 | 1 | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5 | isbn_softcover | 978-3-030-56136-9 | isbn_ebook | 978-3-030-56134-5Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036 | issn_series | 1875-0044 | copyright | Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|