找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet

[复制链接]
查看: 48381|回复: 46
发表于 2025-3-21 16:22:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?
编辑Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt
视频video
概述The only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co
丛书名称The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
图书封面Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?;  Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet
描述.This book brings together a number of essays that are optimistic about the ways certain neuroscientific insights might advance philosophical ethics, and other essays that are more circumspect about the relevance of neuroscience to philosophical ethics. As a whole, the essays form a self-reflective body of work that simultaneously seeks to derive normative ethical implications from neuroscience, and to question whether and how that may be possible at all. In doing so, the collection brings together psychology, neuroscience, philosophy of mind, ethics, and philosophy of science. Neuroscience seeks to understand the biological systems that guide human behavior and cognition. Normative ethics, on the other hand, seeks to understand the system of abstract moral principles dictating how people ought to behave. By studying how the human brain makes moral judgments, can philosophers learn anything about the nature of morality itself? A growing number of researchers believe that neurosciencecan, indeed, provide insights into the questions of philosophical ethics. However, even these advocates acknowledge that the path from neuroscientific .is .to normative ethical .ought .can be quite frau
出版日期Book 2020
关键词neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; mora
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5
isbn_softcover978-3-030-56136-9
isbn_ebook978-3-030-56134-5Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036
issn_series 1875-0044
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?网络公开度




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引频次




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?被引频次学科排名




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?年度引用学科排名




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?读者反馈




书目名称Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:47:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:11:16 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 07:15:37 | 显示全部楼层
Two Theories of Moral Cognition,tists have turned to reinforcement learning, a branch of machine learning, to develop formal, mathematical models of normative cognition. One prominent approach, proposed by Cushman (Curr Opin Behav Sci 3:58–62, 2015), suggests that moral cognition is underwritten by a habitual (‘model-free’) system
发表于 2025-3-22 08:44:48 | 显示全部楼层
Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,uch recent discussion focuses on the dispute between ., who hold that there is a necessary connection between moral judgment and motivation, and ., who deny this. In contrast, I argue that this relation is best seen as a . one: moral judgment . to be accompanied by the appropriate motivation. I supp
发表于 2025-3-22 15:19:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:51:30 | 显示全部楼层
,Normative Implications of Neuroscience and Sociobiology – Intended and Perceived,ic “nature-nurture” debates, including the sociobiology controversy around Harvard biologist E. O. Wilson. Neuroscience is the field that Wilson hoped would continue his work in . (Wilson, Sociobiology: The new synthesis, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, .) in regard to finding an evolutiona
发表于 2025-3-22 23:11:05 | 显示全部楼层
Nervous Norms,a moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q
发表于 2025-3-23 01:22:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:05:16 | 显示全部楼层
Autistic Moral Agency and Integrative Neuroethics, neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctin
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-18 00:13
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表