Titlebook: Dissembling Disability in Early Modern English Drama; Lindsey Row-Heyveld Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 T

Eviction

走调

Rules of Charity: , and the Counterfeit-Disability Tradition,ty. The play presents an early modern notion of the non-standard body that resists determinism. Instead, by dissembling disability with his authentically impaired body, . reveals that performance—rather than predestination—makes Richard truly threatening.

integral

启发

The Long Bones, General Commentsnd to inoculate him (and the audience) against the dangerous ethics of that vengeance. Further, Row-Heyveld argues that consistent attention to audience interpretation—where skillful spectators suspect counterfeit disability and faulty spectators believe and pity dissemblers—fosters suspicion about disability off-stage as well.

向外

祖传财产

needle

大吃大喝

Act the Fool: , and the Conventions of the Counterfeit-Disability Tradition,nd to inoculate him (and the audience) against the dangerous ethics of that vengeance. Further, Row-Heyveld argues that consistent attention to audience interpretation—where skillful spectators suspect counterfeit disability and faulty spectators believe and pity dissemblers—fosters suspicion about disability off-stage as well.

constellation

Double Dissimulation: Counterfeit Disability in ,he counterfeit-disability tradition, this chapter also illustrates how he uses it both to criticize the systems of power that sought to define disability in early modern England and, simultaneously, to suggest that disability was difficult to detect, always potentially false, and undeserving of charity.

glisten

Mandated Masquerade: Disability, Metatheater, and Audience Complicity in , and ,eal audience complicity in creating performative disability. Yet, the tradition also discloses the costs of such skepticism, showing how requiring performativity from disability incriminates audiences in that performance.