Titlebook: Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World; Lei Chen,André Janssen Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Dispute Resolution.Int

小缺点

书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World网络公开度




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World被引频次




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World被引频次学科排名




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World年度引用




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World年度引用学科排名




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World读者反馈




书目名称Dispute Resolution in China, Europe and World读者反馈学科排名

小故事

Tremor

A保存的

Investor-State Arbitration in China: A Comparative Perspective key player in outward foreign direct investment. In light of China’s rise in the foreign investment sphere and the consequence this may have on its engagement with investment claims, this Chapter has two primary purposes. The first purpose is to examine China’s limited experience with ISA under bil

archenemy

For Whom the Bell Tolls: Any Hope Left for Investment Arbitration After ,?ticularly explores the potential impact of the judgment on the status of other intra-EU bilateral investment treaties as well as the enforcement of awards that have already been rendered in ISDS proceedings. The Chapter further discusses the highly controversial question of the . decision’s impact o

superfluous

Palestinian Perceptions of Internal Factorsthe NCC and its mode of operation. Finally, the Chapter analyses the NCC’s challenges and perspectives. What will be the NCC’s success rate? Or should the Dutch judiciary temper its ambitions for the NCC? Is the NCC doomed to failure, or will the NCC be a successful and innovative legal concept?

superfluous

Palestinian Perceptions of Internal Factors even with efforts to substantially reform the arbitration laws and institutions. To examine arbitration reform efforts and outcomes of Asia Pacific jurisdictions, this Chapter relies on a hypothetical model of arbitration reform. This model is then tested against the reform pathways undertaken by 1

orthodox

Towards a Sociology of Vulnerabilitylaw does not provide respondents with sufficient remedies for interim measures that are taken wrongfully. In terms of the interim measures’ relation to arbitration, PRC law does not empower arbitral tribunals to take interim measures. Any application for interim measures in the process of arbitratio

乳白光

约会