Titlebook: Dismantling the Mexican State?; Rob Aitken (Lecturer in Anthropology),Nikki Craske Book 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan P

头盔

Cacophonous

,The State, the Countryside … and Capitalism,ciety in post-revolutionary Mexico. Wayne Cornelius judged . reform ‘probably the most politically audacious step to be taken by Carlos Salinas during his presidency thus far’, given the role of the . in the maintenance of political control over the peasantry, suggesting that the constitutional amen

meretricious

Dismantling the ,: A Lesson in Controlled Pluralism,f the Revolution (1910–17). Article 27 of the 1917 Mexican Constitution established a system of land reform based on agricultural communities known as . — since 1917, 29 951 . representing over 55 per cent of the Mexican land area have been created. The term . virtually defies a simplistic definitio

VERT

Delivering the Goods: Solidarity, Land Regularisation and Urban Services,itical reformism in Mexico. From its earliest days PRONASOL was promoted as ‘a new style of social policy’ giving ‘a new dimension to public investment and social expenditure’ (González Tiburcio, 1992: 4–5). and seeking ‘to create a new relationship between the people and the state’ (Salinas, cited

控制

Towards a Pluricultural Nation: The Limits of , and Article 4,ger of armed indigenous rebellion. Quoting experts at the United Nations, she suggested that such an uprising could be imminent as indigenous peoples had learned from political experiences internationally (R. Rojas, 1991). By this point, mid-way through the ., the Salinas administration had undertak

Encumber

,Citizens with Dignity: Opposition and Government in San Luis Potosí, 1938–93,s in northern Mexico, the controversial 1988 presidential elections, the rise of . and, most recently, the uprising in Chiapas. Political scientists and sociologists may therefore be tempted to emphasise important ruptures with the past: a new State is discerned, as the old one is dismantled; civil

LATER

,Opposition to PRI ‘Hegemony’ in Oaxaca, with democratisation? Having signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1992, Mexico in 1994 held Presidential and legislative elections that were scrutinised, as never before, for their efficiency, openness and fairness. To an outsider, this may seem strange, since Mexico claims to

遭遇

Mendicant

https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35002-0in policy triggered deep nationalist fears and raised the possibility of a large-scale realignment of lower income groups away from the PRI and towards a State-led and socially more caring alternative represented by Cárdenas and the . (FDN).

温顺

,Strömungen mit Dichteänderung (Gasdynamik),ipation of society in the public sphere, as well as both the strengthening and subsequent crisis of the social movements. and party political opposition, but above all, it is due to the fact that the State party was not only incapable of incorporating itself into the process, but was indeed trying t