Titlebook: Disguised Academic Plagiarism; A Typology and Case M. V. Dougherty Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

AMEND

Compression Plagiarism,e under-recognized variety of plagiarism—designated here as . .—consists of the distillation of a lengthy scholarly text into a short one, followed by the publication of the short one under a new name with inadequate credit to the original author. In typical cases, compression plagiarism is invisibl

贪心

Dispersal Plagiarism,vided by a plagiarist who then publishes portions of it in various venues with insufficient credit to the genuine author. A typical case involves the appropriation of a book by a plagiarist who publishes the chapters (or sections of chapters) in discrete articles across several journals. In many ins

Seizure

样式

Exposition Plagiarism, non-plagiarizing study, readers are presented with a clear separation of three kinds of authority: (1) the voices of authors of primary canonical texts whose works are cited; (2) the voices of exegetes in the secondary literature whose interpretations are analyzed, and (3) the voice of the author o

业余爱好者

Template Plagiarism,sage on a different subject by changing a key term. For example, altering a passage that discusses one country by substituting the name of another country produces the illusion of original research on the second country. In its more complex variety, template plagiarism may be co-extensive with anoth

anthropologist

Conclusion: Remedies for Disguised Plagiarism, additional concealment beyond the mere copying of words with inadequate attribution. The book focused on six types of disguised plagiarism: translation, compression, dispersal, magisterial, exposition, and template plagiarism. This concluding chapter identifies resources that assist editors, publis

finale

perpetual

hysterectomy

Conclusion: Remedies for Disguised Plagiarism,on, compression, dispersal, magisterial, exposition, and template plagiarism. This concluding chapter identifies resources that assist editors, publishers, and whistleblowers in maintaining the integrity of the body of published research.

僵硬

Several Empirical Justifications as genuine products of research. I conclude by arguing that an open discussion of plagiarizing articles in philosophy is necessary for maintaining the reliability of the body of published research and for restoring integrity to scholarly communication.