| 书目名称 | Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience | | 副标题 | Psychology, Neurophy | | 编辑 | Gerhard Benetka,Hans Werbik | | 视频video | | | 概述 | Main points of criticism against the generalizations of neuroscientific research are explained.The viewpoint of phenomenological psychology, which is less common in the US-American discussion, is pres | | 丛书名称 | Annals of Theoretical Psychology | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | .The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and – if possible – considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. .. . | | 出版日期 | Book 2021 | | 关键词 | Cognitive Neuroscience; Phenomenology; Cultural Psychology; Biological Psychology; Philosophical critiqu | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 | | isbn_softcover | 978-3-030-71042-2 | | isbn_ebook | 978-3-030-71040-8Series ISSN 0747-5241 Series E-ISSN 2512-2207 | | issn_series | 0747-5241 | | copyright | The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 17:21:17
