Titlebook: Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom; Tony Evans,Peter Hupe Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

Alienated

Prophylaxis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4rship as such. Particularly some socio-legal scholars are inclined to contrast it with their own approach to the study of discretion. After setting out the main characteristics of the legal paradigm, the chapter continues by illustrating that a socio-legal approach of discretion indeed complements t

TERRA

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4ublic policy. Professionals in implementing social policy submit periodic mandates for approval to their principals to use discretion in customizing benefits offered and matching efforts required from their counterparts. Transactions concluded reveal the trade-offs between criteria of good governanc

Processes

LOPE

frozen-shoulder

建筑师

Constraints, Benefits, and Opportunitiesin relation to key elements of governance: bureaucracy as the institutional bedding; the policy process as ‘path’ for the directional part of governing and street-level practice as the locus of interactions with citizens where policy intentions ultimately are being shaped. This part further explores

音的强弱

Digest

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22180-5ified. First, discretion concerns the freedom to act as granted in a set of rules. Second, the way a rule is applied leaves the rule intact. Third, norms aimed to prescribe action stem from many sources in addition to formal rules. Fourth, cultural standards and the institutional context are importa

排他

Tony Evans,Peter HupeStimulates debate and enhances cross-disciplinary research collaboration on discretion.The first edited collection to provide insights on the topic from various theoretical angles.Explores a central t