Titlebook: Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions; Shaun Bowler,Amihai Glazer Book 2008 Shaun Bowler and Amihai Glazer 2008 cam

Prehypertension

书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions网络公开度




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions被引频次




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions被引频次学科排名




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions年度引用




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions年度引用学科排名




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions读者反馈




书目名称Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions读者反馈学科排名

招致

Direct Democracy’s Impact on American Political Institutions978-0-230-61202-0

闷热

legislate

斜谷

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02661-4 democracy is that the direct democracy process weakens political parties, thereby undercutting not just their role in modern democracy but also some of the central pillars of representative democracy itself (Broder 2000, see also Schrag 1998).

词汇记忆方法

词汇记忆方法

,“Hybrid Democracy” and Its Consequences,arguments. Some aspects of direct democracy, such as voting behavior, are reasonably well understood, whereas other aspects, such as how parties are shaped by direct democracy or what direct democracy means for governability, are poorly understood. The chapters in this volume further our understanding of these important yet understudied areas.

N防腐剂

Direct Democracy and the Public Agenda: Ballot Initiatives and Public Beliefs about Important Probllegislation boosts the civic life of states by increasing political interest (Tolbert and Bowen, this volume), participation (Smith 2001; Smith and Tolbert 2004), political knowledge (Pantoja and Segura 2003; Smith 2002), and political efficacy (Bowler and Donovan 2002).

prosperity

急急忙忙

Direct Democracy and the Stability of State Policy,bility. That is, initiatives may act as “veto points,” disrupting logrolling coalitions, and thus leading to stability of policy. This chapter empirically tests these two competing hypotheses, using expenditure data from U.S. states from 1980 through 2002.