Titlebook: Difficulty in Poetry; A Stylistic Model Davide Castiglione Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 stylistics of poe

Chylomicron

书目名称Difficulty in Poetry影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry网络公开度




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry被引频次




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry被引频次学科排名




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry年度引用




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry年度引用学科排名




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry读者反馈




书目名称Difficulty in Poetry读者反馈学科排名

mechanism

nuclear-tests

Organisms of Difficulty: The Data two empirical studies that provide the RIDs for a subset of the poems. The first study, a pencil-and-paper task, aims at exploring the degree of comprehension elicited by the poems. In the second, an online reading task, reading times are recorded to measure the resistance opposed by the poems used in the first study.

GEST

to a selection of 20th and 21st century Anglo-American poemsThis book theoretically defines and linguistically analyses the popular notion that poetry is ‘difficult’ - hard to read, hard to understand, hard to engage with. It is the first work to offer a stylistic and cognitive model that sheds new

neologism

Facet-Joints

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25694-3ng and by appealing to psycholinguistic findings. These models are implemented with an interpretive level (significance) borrowed from structuralist scholars and deemed central to poetry reading. In short, the chapter details new conceptual coordinates for the study of poetic difficulty.

Facet-Joints

Recommender Systems for the Social Webds, syntactic ambiguity and lack of narrativity). Prototypical effects are suggested for each LID based on the processing operations they are most likely to challenge. This implies that the model allows to predict readerly reactions based on linguistic description.

就职

Jingwen Zhang,Loren Terveen,Lucy E. Dunnelicit than business letters or recipes, easy poems draw on a ‘ready-made’ literary meaning which can be retrieved top-down. High intersubjective topic agreement, elaborations on emotions, high reading speed and a tendency to paraphrase the text are the most notable RIDs elicited by this aesthetic typology.

蚊子

善于骗人