Titlebook: Dewey‘s Philosophy of Science; Roberto Gronda Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Dewey Philosophy of Science.Dewey Logical cons

Cumbersome

Experience,erience has posed serious difficulties to his interpreters. My proposal is irenic: I take Dewey’s experience to be a function performed by living beings who have the capacity to master the use of language. I focus on the metaphilosophical use that Dewey makes of the notion of experience thus underst

ALIAS

Endemic

类型

Construction,is carried out. Dewey is explicit that all the elements that are used in inquiry – and which he calls ‘propositions’ – are linguistic, and that taken together they contribute to the construction of the judgment that closes inquiry. I will reconstruct Dewey’s account of evidence, a priori knowledge,

痛恨

可行

憎恶

MONY

Kuang-Yao Lee,Bing Li,Hongyu Zhaotogether they contribute to the construction of the judgment that closes inquiry. I will reconstruct Dewey’s account of evidence, a priori knowledge, and objectivity, and I will show how the latter paves the way for the formulation of a strong form of scientific pluralism.

善辩

不给啤