用户名  找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Developments in the Methodology of Social Science; Werner Leinfellner,Eckehart Köhler Book 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, H

[复制链接]
查看: 43244|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 16:10:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science
编辑Werner Leinfellner,Eckehart Köhler
视频video
丛书名称Theory and Decision Library
图书封面Titlebook: Developments in the Methodology of Social Science;  Werner Leinfellner,Eckehart Köhler Book 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, H
描述Philosophy of Science deals with the problem, ‘What is science?‘ It seems that the answer to this question can only be found if we have an answer to the question, ‘How does science function?‘ Thus, the study of the methodology of social sciences is a prominent factor in any analysis of these sciences. The history of philosophy shows clearly that the answer to the question, ‘How does science function?‘ was the conditio sine qua non of any kind of philosophy of science, epistemology and even of logic. Aristotle, Hume, Kant, Mill, Russell, to mention a few classical authors, clearly emphasized the primacy of methodology of science for any kind of philosophy of science. One may even state that analyses of the presup­ positions, the foundations, the aims, goals and purposes of science are nothing else than analyses of their general and specific formal, as well as practical and empirical methods. Thus, the whole program of any phi­ losophy of science is dependent on the analysis of the methods of sciences and the establishment of their criteria. If the study of scientific method is the predominant factor in the philosophy of science, then all the other problems will depend on the outcome
出版日期Book 1974
关键词ETA; German; Immanuel Kant; Methodenstreit; assessment; decision theory; experiment; logic; methodology; phil
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2259-0
isbn_softcover978-90-277-0539-6
isbn_ebook978-94-010-2259-0
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1974
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science网络公开度




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science被引频次




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science年度引用




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science读者反馈




书目名称Developments in the Methodology of Social Science读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:11:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:56:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:05:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:47:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 13:25:57 | 显示全部楼层
nswer to the question, ‘How does science function?‘ Thus, the study of the methodology of social sciences is a prominent factor in any analysis of these sciences. The history of philosophy shows clearly that the answer to the question, ‘How does science function?‘ was the conditio sine qua non of an
发表于 2025-3-22 19:07:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:17:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:58:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:10:41 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-21 08:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表