Titlebook: Developments in Modern Historiography; Henry Kozicki (Professor Emeritus of English and L Book 1993 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macm

delta-waves

河潭

Whither History? Reflections on the Comparison between Historians and Scientists, approaches, and purposes have multiplied so rapidly over the past forty years that anyone who looks at the historical enterprise as a whole is likely to deny that it has any discernable shape or mission. Neither research nor writing appear to be guided by common principles or aims. As a result, bo

nephritis

The Sociological Historiography of Charles Tilly he seems to be saying two different kinds of things about bourgeois historiography at odds with each other. I do not believe that statements seemingly at odds are immediately self-canceling. On the contrary, statements that express an inherent tension sometimes serve us better than those that do no

灰姑娘

Dialectical Rationality in History: A Paradigmatic Approach to Karl Marx’s l systems, and analytical reflection based on real history. The general tendency in the history of socio-philosophical thought is the shift from the first approach to the second. In the post-World War II period, analytical method was practiced in a two-fold way, as in the manner of the early and the

小淡水鱼

AXIOM

Marxism and Historians of the Familyics, and politics without underestimating the full significance of each in human society.”. But historians of the development of the family, if not of its origin, have for the most part passed the last fifteen years without paying much attention to this challenge; and in these days it perhaps sounds

熔岩

“They Were Not Quite Like Us”: The Presumption of Qualitative Difference in Historical Writing”ait that has been treated both as the signifier of the fundamental difference between history and all other forms of inquiry, and as the essential mechanism generating all epistemologically interesting properties and structures of historical writing (or historical knowledge). Historical inquiry has