找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Development Strategies and Inter-Group Violence; Insights on Conflict William Ascher,Natalia Mirovitskaya Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if appli

[复制链接]
楼主: rupture
发表于 2025-3-25 04:21:51 | 显示全部楼层
Springer Series in Solid-State Sciencesic strategies—austerity measures, interest rates, tax rates, and exchange rates—that may involve less structural change but nonetheless can have profound impacts on the distribution of benefits and the bases for conflict.
发表于 2025-3-25 10:35:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 14:22:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:40:47 | 显示全部楼层
Psychology of Conflict and Developmentes. This chapter examines how psychological mechanisms can help to explain levels of inter-group conflict, and how to apply these insights in designing conflict-sensitive development strategies. The mechanisms are complementary rather than competing, as no single theory can speak to all of the conte
发表于 2025-3-25 21:43:23 | 显示全部楼层
The Perils of Liberalization: Prices, Market Access, and privatizationent views of its fairness. Each variation may also give the impression that the government is favoring particular groups, and induce people to view themselves or others as unified entities because of what they assume is uniform treatment. This chapter focuses on the fundamental strategies of freeing
发表于 2025-3-26 00:32:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:53:10 | 显示全部楼层
Grabbing Assets and Opportunitiestributive impacts. In the short run, at least, both regulation and spending policies have winners and losers: regulations limit the behavior of some at the expense of others; budget allocations require taxation or diversion of allocations from one set of actors to another. The promotion of one secto
发表于 2025-3-26 11:22:30 | 显示全部楼层
Favoring Sectorscture, etc.) have had major impacts on which groups are favored or disadvantaged, placated or threatened, as well as on general societal stability. Sectoral policies, that is, the policies that favor related types of activities, have been among the most debated in the modern history of development e
发表于 2025-3-26 13:47:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 20:09:59 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-23 08:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表