Titlebook: Deterrence and Juvenile Crime; Results from a Natio Anne L. Schneider Book 1990 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1990 Crime.Criminal Behavior.

DUMMY

书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime网络公开度




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime被引频次




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime被引频次学科排名




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime年度引用




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime年度引用学科排名




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime读者反馈




书目名称Deterrence and Juvenile Crime读者反馈学科排名

debouch

Policy, Perceptions, and Criminal Behavior,tical leaders, and in some academic circles. Deterrence theory fits nicely into the modern American view that individual behavior is driven mainly by incentives and that public policy can influence behavior most efficiently by manipulating the costs, benefits, and risks that adhere in particular dec

性学院

Juvenile Offenders: Methods and Measures,quate research designs from which to make causal inferences, and unreliable measurement of key concepts. Findings from one jurisdiction, even if a sufficient level of internal validity has been established, are not generalizable to another jurisdiction and replication of studies using similar concep

阻挡

The Perceptual Basis of Juvenile Crime,s about which variables will be most important or which are more sensitive to public policy influences. Deterrence theory is based on the assumption that individuals are self-interested utility maximizers who respond to the net utility (i.e., the expected net gain or lose) offered by the crime oppor

Employee

Direct Effects of Programs on Recidivism,and serious offenders. If perceptions of certainty and severity of punishment influence intentions regarding reoffending, but have little or nothing to do with subsequent criminal behavior, then it is unlikely that programs emphasizing the fear factor will be effective. These programs may seem to ho

繁重

Experiences, Perceptions, and Recidivism,n programs suppressed offense rates and not all outperformed the program against which they were compared. Traditional probation fared the worst in the analysis, as it seldom demonstrated even a reduction in postprogram offense rates and never produced better results than the restitution programs. I

繁重

Conclusions,avior by manipulating the costs, benefits, or risks of alternative actions. Simplified versions of expected utility theory hold that behavior is contingent upon net utility and that it does not matter much, if at all, whether one seeks to change behavior by altering the benefits, altering the costs,

教义

Deterrence and Juvenile Crime978-1-4613-8925-5Series ISSN 1431-7540

Mettle

使无效

The Punishment Perspective,ll change in predictable ways. When punishment does not work as expected, the underlying assumptions of the punishment model are rarely questioned; instead, remedies are sought through more punishment, delivered more rapidly, and with greater certainty.