Titlebook: Desisting Sisters; Gender, Power and De Úna Barr Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019 desistance.social bonds.fam

SUGAR

A Case of Growing Up? A Feminist Critique of Maturational Theory,rschi (.. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1990) that desistance is something which happens naturally with the passage of time. Instead, this chapter will argue for a critical analysis of desistance, rooted in feminist theory and epistemology.

IRS

乐器演奏者

步兵

Defining Desistance,s internationally and particularly within the context of England and Wales. The chapter goes on to critically consider the contested definitions for desistance and the historical development of studies concerned with ending offending. The gender blindness of desistance research thus far, reflecting

larder

Atrium

A Case of Growing Up? A Feminist Critique of Maturational Theory,g contemporary female desistance journeys. This chapter analyses three trajectories of transgressing the law experienced by the women involved in the research; early-onset, late-onset and one-off transgressions of the law. These trajectories contest the findings of authors such as Gottfredson and Hi

罗盘

evasive

Adulate

(In)Justice Systems,articular, the chapter examines the criminal justice paradigm ‘Transforming Rehabilitation’ (TR) and its links to ‘Payment by Results’ (PbR), focusing on their problematic nature, particularly in the context of women’s desistance. The rhetoric of the TR agenda to include PbR is unhelpful to women at

characteristic