Titlebook: Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction; Thomas Horan Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Rus

endocarditis

书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction网络公开度




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction被引频次




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction被引频次学科排名




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction年度引用




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction年度引用学科排名




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction读者反馈




书目名称Desire and Empathy in Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction读者反馈学科排名

Aggressive

,Redemptive Atavism in Yevgeny Zamyatin’s ,,nal morality through the sexual passion between a conflicted loyalist and a sensual firebrand. Building on London’s criticism of both . utopianism and organized religion, . satirizes the intersection of evangelism and colonialism, primarily through inversions of biblical themes and imagery, includin

不能妥协

,The Sexual Life of the Savage in Aldous Huxley’s ,,ludes the realization of a monogamous relationship between these characters, Huxley—anticipating the theories of Herbert Marcuse—suggests that the deferral of sexual gratification can be an aspirational and ultimately enlightening force..Addressing the similarities between . and ., the chapter analy

aquatic

,Katharine Burdekin’s ,, a Gay Romance,ing effects of homophobia as well as misogyny. Burdekin presents queerness as organic rather than situational, differentiating herself from a range of mid-century intellectuals who misunderstood homosexuality as a conscious choice, a disorder, or a circumstantial phenomenon. The chapter also address

COWER

书法

,Desire and Empathy in George Orwell’s ,,thics and community depend on instinctive rather than intellectual inclinations. Although Winston and Julia are ultimately lost, Orwell locates a durable system of ethics in the working class, one sustained by the workers’ sexual autonomy. The Party’s claims about its strength, about the political i

书法

,Ludic Perversions and Enduring Communities in Margaret Atwood’s ,,Atwood’s dystopia critiques capitalism and privatization. Just as . demonstrates that progressive rhetoric can be appropriated for totalitarian purposes, . shows how the language of feminism can be distorted by a chauvinist ruling elite to support regressive gender roles. Atwood also reworks Orwelli

Formidable

Conclusion,t the difference between dystopia and utopia is largely a matter of subjective preference: the tendency to embrace freedom from obligations and to submit to external authority for the sake of security is prevalent. This clarifies why institutional control of sexuality can be appealing even to those

Density

2946-4471 s under analysis illustrate a connection between sexuality aThis book assesses key works of twentieth-century dystopian fiction, including Katharine Burdekin’s .Swastika Night., George Orwell’s .Nineteen Eighty-Four., and Margaret Atwood’s .The Handmaid’s Tale., to demonstrate that the major authors

高谈阔论