找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research; John Forge Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Just War Theory.c

[复制链接]
查看: 10007|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 17:31:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research
编辑John Forge
视频video
概述Discusses the neglected topic of weapons research in the literature of applied ethics/applied moral philosophy.Argues that weapons research is morally wrong and morally unjustifable.Provides a wide ra
丛书名称Research Ethics Forum
图书封面Titlebook: Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research;  John Forge Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Just War Theory.c
描述.The pilot-less drones, smart bombs and other high-tech weapons on display in recent conflicts are all the outcome of weapons research. However, the kind of scientific and technological endeavour has been around for a long time, producing not only the armaments of Nazi Germany and the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, but the catapults used in ancient Greece and Rome and the assault rifles used by child soldiers in Africa.  In this book John Forge examines such weapons research and asks whether it is morally acceptable to undertake such an activity. He argues that it is in fact morally wrong to take part in weapons research as its primary purpose is to produce the means to harm others, and moreover he argues that all attempts to then justify participation in weapons research do not stand up to scrutiny. .This book has wide appeal in fields of philosophy and related areas, as well to a more general audience who are puzzled about the rate at which new weapons are accumulated. .
出版日期Book 2013
关键词Just War Theory; case against weapons research; common morality; moral justification; war and research; w
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5736-3
isbn_softcover978-94-007-9524-2
isbn_ebook978-94-007-5736-3Series ISSN 2212-9529 Series E-ISSN 2212-9537
issn_series 2212-9529
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research网络公开度




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research被引频次




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research被引频次学科排名




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research年度引用




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research年度引用学科排名




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research读者反馈




书目名称Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:26:02 | 显示全部楼层
Weapons, Weapons Research and the Case Against Weapons Research,s, so I begin with some general remarks about weapons and about how we might define and characterise them. Here I also comment briefly on the history of weapons development. In the last two sections of the chapter I introduce the moral dimension of WR, explain why it is wrong and state the case agai
发表于 2025-3-22 01:50:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:09:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:30:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:55:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:03:07 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:43:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:38:04 | 显示全部楼层
Weapons Research, Contexts and Justifications, and the Analogy with Explanation,compromised activity, one that appeals to the actual historical circumstances – the . – in which the work is done. We have seen that weapons research has a history stretching back over two millennia, and the products of WR, from catapults to atomic weapons, have played a crucial role in shaping worl
发表于 2025-3-23 08:05:36 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 02:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表