找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems ’96; Proceedings of the E Francois Bodart,Jean Vanderdonckt Conference procee

[复制链接]
楼主: 极大
发表于 2025-3-30 09:43:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 15:48:05 | 显示全部楼层
Towards an integrated proposal for Interactive Systems design based on TLIM and ICO an open issue the identification of systematic methods able to support designers and developers in specifying and demonstrating properties of user interfaces. TLIM and ICO are two formal methods which have been used for this purpose with interesting results. They address similar concepts but also h
发表于 2025-3-30 16:46:33 | 显示全部楼层
The Evaluation Of User Interface Notationshese notations are intended to strip away the clutter of implementation details that frequently obscure interaction properties. Unfortunately, relatively little work has been done to evaluate the usability of these notations for ‘real-world’ interfaces. We have, therefore, conducted an empirical eva
发表于 2025-3-30 23:50:06 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 04:55:24 | 显示全部楼层
Risk Analysis, Impact and Interaction Modellingrs are aware of the relationships between their design decisions, operator errors, and the hazards associated with a system. In this paper, we demonstrate how information from risk analysis can be combined with formal specification of the HMI, to support designers in exploring these relationships. W
发表于 2025-3-31 08:41:19 | 显示全部楼层
Design assistance for user-adapted interactionticulation of user interface adaptation constituents during the early phases of design and development of a user interface. It is claimed that this type of adaptation support is required to ensure accessibility of a user interface by different user groups with varying abilities, requirements and pre
发表于 2025-3-31 13:10:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 13:54:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 20:27:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-31 22:56:21 | 显示全部楼层
Evaluating the Interfaces of Three Theorem Proving Assistantsdomain. We examine three TPAs employing quite different styles of interaction. We consider the support provided by the interfaces for each of four mechanisms for efficient interactive proof: planning, reuse, reflection and articulation. Common themes are observed, as are strengths and weaknesses of
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-9 05:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表