找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Deontic Logic in Computer Science; 11th International C Thomas Ågotnes,Jan Broersen,Dag Elgesem Conference proceedings 2012 Springer-Verlag

[复制链接]
楼主: Traction
发表于 2025-3-25 06:45:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:29:01 | 显示全部楼层
The Logic of Obligation as Weakest Permission,ogics adequacy w.r.t. the paradoxes of (classic) deontic logic and provide a sound and complete axiomatization for it. We finally show that practical, rational recommendations in games provide a natural, concrete application of such an understanding of obligations and permissions.
发表于 2025-3-25 15:21:57 | 显示全部楼层
Discussion Paper: Changing Norms Is Changing Obligation Change,es norms from obligations. Third, we present a semantical two dimensional view on change. Fourth, we illustrate norm change using automata changing automata. Fifth, we compare norm change with analogous mechanisms in non-normative contexts.
发表于 2025-3-25 19:44:41 | 显示全部楼层
Deontic Logic in Computer Science978-3-642-31570-1Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
发表于 2025-3-25 21:39:15 | 显示全部楼层
Lehren und Lernen im dualen Studiumvisualize abstract normative systems, in such a way that we are able to reason with institutional facts, obligations and permissions. Moreover, we detect meaningful patterns emerging from the proposed visualization, and we show how these patterns can be used to define commonly used reusable solutions.
发表于 2025-3-26 01:39:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:41:12 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24583-1social sciences, it has been far less studied in the field of deontic logic and multi-agent systems (MASs). We discuss different aspects of moral agency such as the distinction between desires and moral values and the concept of moral agent. All these concepts are formalized in a variant of . logic with explicit actions.
发表于 2025-3-26 11:36:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 13:27:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:25:38 | 显示全部楼层
Possible World Semantics for Defeasible Deontic Logic,gics are defined proof theoretically based on the proof conditions for the logic. While several logic programming, operational and argumentation semantics have been provided for defeasible logics, possible world semantics for (modal) defeasible logics remained elusive. In this paper we address this issue.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 18:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表