Titlebook: Deontic Logic in Computer Science; 10th International C Guido Governatori,Giovanni Sartor Conference proceedings 2010 Springer-Verlag Berli

Hermit

书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science网络公开度




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science被引频次




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science被引频次学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science年度引用




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science年度引用学科排名




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science读者反馈




书目名称Deontic Logic in Computer Science读者反馈学科排名

绕着哥哥问

变色龙

Towards a Logical Analysis of the Judgment on Facts,rts) is the judgment about the facts in issue. In a sense, actually, judicial decisions derive from a sort of combination of legal and factual judgments. Lawyers -and logicians- usually deal with the . dimension of these decisions and analyze the features and the structure of legal arguments and of

领袖气质

dapper

A Dyadic Operator for the Gradation of Desirability,ss to the logic, it allows both the definition of a monadic desirability operator similar to the SDL obligation, and the expression of the relative level of desirability of target formulae. The interpretation of this logic on a linear structure of worlds ordered by desirability makes its semantics m

relieve

Deontics = Betterness + Priority,perties (i.e., a ‘law’ explicitly representing a standard of behavior). The correspondence between these two orderings offers a rich perspective from which to look at deontic scenarios and puzzles, and in particular at contrary-to-duties. The framework naturally lends itself to describing dynamics i

relieve

Axioms for Obligation and Robustness with Temporal Logic,rs, which quantify over failure-free paths and paths with one more failure respectively. This paper gives an axiomatisation for all the operators of RoCTL* with the exception of the Until operator; this fragment is able to express similar contrary-to-duty obligations to the full RoCTL* logic. We cal

grudging

HUSH

Relevance, Derogation and Permission,problem with the underlying full-meet contraction operation. We suggest a solution that presupposes a particular normal form for codes of norms, adapted from the theory of relevance through propositional letter sharing. We then establish a correspondence between contractions on sets of norms in inpu

cognizant

Retroactive Legal Changes and Revision Theory in Defeasible Logic,l dynamics. In particular, we showed that these techniques are not suitable when legal changes are retroactive. This suggested to adopt a different logical model able to express two main timelines, one internal to a given temporal version of the legal system, and another relative to how the legal sy