Titlebook: Democratic Wars; Looking at the Dark Anna Geis (Research Fellow),Lothar Brock (Professo Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmil

LASH

Christopher L. Skelly,Ross Milnertional organization as well as interdependence are becoming ever more complex, we may expect that the effectiveness of the ‘triangle of peace’ even in a mixed group of states will grow also. But how, then, are we to account for the persistence of the unilateral use of force by democracies (vis-a-vis non-democracies)?

aesthetic

Introduction: the Theoretical Challenge of Democratic Warsiscovery of Immanuel Kant’s famous hypothesis in Germany (Czempiel, 1972) and more than 20 years after its revival in the United States (Doyle, 1983a, b) is on the rise, democratic peace increasingly seems to be linked to war. Obviously, there is a dark side to democratic peace, and this is the subject of the present volume.

MUMP

包裹

Introduction: the Theoretical Challenge of Democratic Wars also in the mindsets of Western politicians and diplomats. Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Tony Blair and Condoleezza Rice, to name but a few, have all referred to this international virtuous cycle: promote freedom and liberty in the world, which is equivalent to promoting democracy, and we will have

巨头

Democratic Wars and Military Interventions, 1946–2002: the Monadic Level Reconsideredt to violent means against other regimes and engage in as many wars as non-democratic regimes?. In addition, since the end of the Cold War, democracies have legitimized their interventions with a common set of reasons. Wars and interventions are fought in the name of human rights and democratization

别名

Democratic Peace: Many Data, Little Explanation? other parties, (b) that democracies on average might be slightly, but not strongly, less war-prone than other states, (c) that there is a vast variance among democracies as regards their involvement in wars and militarized disputes.

引导

intrigue

Triangulating War: the Use of Force by Democracies as a Variant of Democratic Peaceructed by Bruce Russett and John Oneal (2001). ‘Bringing Kant back in’, Russett and Oneal identify . and . as the cornerstones of a self-enforcing peace system. The present chapter takes up this concept and argues that the self-enforcing peace system is not confined only to inter-democratic relation

以烟熏消毒

不能逃避