Titlebook: Democratic Foreign Policy Making; Problems of Divided Robert Pahre Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006 de

风俗习惯

书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making网络公开度




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making被引频次




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making被引频次学科排名




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making年度引用




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making年度引用学科排名




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making读者反馈




书目名称Democratic Foreign Policy Making读者反馈学科排名

fibroblast

Divided Government and International Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century,ive-legislative disagreement makes international cooperation more difficult (Friman 1993; Hammond and Prins 1999; Iida 1993; but Karol 2000; Milner 1997; Milner and Rosendorff 1997; Mo 1995; O’Halloran 1994; but Pahre 2001a). With complete information, the executives negotiate an agreement if the le

畸形

不能强迫我

无畏

Conclusion: Democracy and Foreign Policy,de safe for democracy.” He sought not only safety for democracy in the United States, but the spread of democracy and self-determination throughout the world. Wilson presumed that many good things, from peace to wealth, would flow from success in this endeavor, cemented by a community of democracies

modifier

http://image.papertrans.cn/d/image/265211.jpg

modifier

Book 2006Leading scholars from the United States and the European Union examine how democracies make foreign policy when their citizens disagree. The authors focus in particular on differences of opinion between the legislature and the executive - often called ‘divided government‘ - and the constraints of public opinion on a leader‘s actions.

observatory

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230601444democracy; Europe; European Union; European Union (EU); executive; foreign policy; government; Institution;

细微的差异

978-1-349-53526-2Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2006

分贝

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6663-6“Democracy” plays a central role in foreign policy today. Both abroad and at home, this is true in two senses. First, democracy is often the subject of U.S. foreign policy, as it is in many nations. President George W. Bush, like President William Clinton before him, has made the spread of democracy abroad an explicit goal of U.S. foreign policy.