找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Democracy, Populism, and Truth; Mark Christopher Navin,Richard Nunan Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 Democracy and Populism.

[复制链接]
楼主: CLOG
发表于 2025-3-28 16:00:42 | 显示全部楼层
Reflections on the Root Causes of Outrage Discourse on Social Mediaificant physical, social and economic displacement that has occurred in many post-industrialised countries in recent decades. While outrage discourse is a feature of political discussion on social media in many countries, this essay focuses in particular on developments in the USA and the UK.
发表于 2025-3-28 19:23:25 | 显示全部楼层
Identifying Political Participants on Social Media: Conflicts of Epistemic Justice disadvantages associated with more traditional media. It then sets out the epistemological difficulties of both content-regulation and the marketplace of ideas. It concludes with a defense of source transparency, tempered by the need to protect the identities of those who may be endangered by disclosure.
发表于 2025-3-29 02:54:10 | 显示全部楼层
As Maine Goes, So Goes the Nation? Ranked Choice Voting and STV as Antidotes to Tribal Populism. The parallels raise comparable questions for potential application on the national stage. As Maine’s case illustrates, political, statutory, and constitutional hurdles to effective electoral reform movements can be quite serious, but perhaps not insurmountable.
发表于 2025-3-29 04:36:09 | 显示全部楼层
1873-877X populism.Addresses the relationships between populism and dThis book tackles questions related to democracy, populism and truth, with results that are sure to inform pressing academic and popular debates. It is common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements a
发表于 2025-3-29 07:54:53 | 显示全部楼层
Indikationen — Kontraindikationene democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.
发表于 2025-3-29 14:58:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 18:09:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 21:53:58 | 显示全部楼层
Democracy, Truth, and Understanding: An Epistemic Argument for Democracystemic arguments. The first is that we attend to other epistemic concepts—notably understanding—which are often left out of the equation. The second is that we also revisit and revise the concept of truth in which the epistemic argument is typically framed.
发表于 2025-3-30 00:59:46 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2020s common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements as populist. Some are progressive advocates of greater economic democracy or individual rights, while others are recognizably authoritarian and anti-democratic, even while claiming to defend democracy. What all
发表于 2025-3-30 05:20:03 | 显示全部楼层
Democracy and Populisme democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-4-30 21:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表