Titlebook: Democracy and Military Force; Philip P. Everts Book 2002 Philip P. Everts 2002 Cold War.democracy.Europe.Gulf War

protocol

书目名称Democracy and Military Force影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Democracy and Military Force影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Democracy and Military Force网络公开度




书目名称Democracy and Military Force网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Democracy and Military Force被引频次




书目名称Democracy and Military Force被引频次学科排名




书目名称Democracy and Military Force年度引用




书目名称Democracy and Military Force年度引用学科排名




书目名称Democracy and Military Force读者反馈




书目名称Democracy and Military Force读者反馈学科排名

平淡而无味

Führbar oder nicht? (Schritt II)ng history of, often intense, normative, theoretical and empirical debates. In the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau started to discuss democracy and its implications for policy-making. The debate has never stopped since then, and continues until today, albeit with varyi

讨好美人

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08192-0he vast research on the concept of public opinion as one of the most enduring concepts in the social sciences, its definition remains controversial. ‘Public opinions’, like beauty, is essentially in the eyes of the beholder. Indeed, the difficulty of defining public opinion as an object of empirical

conscience

Narrative

Erfolgsfaktoren in Reengineering-Projekten either not interested or not involved, and hence governments enjoy, at least initially, considerable freedom of action, based on a . (as mentioned in Chapter 3). Although governments may still enjoy considerable freedom of action in foreign affairs in general and in emergency situations in particul

BROOK

BROOK

Eructation

Zielsteuerung (Target Controlling)tal changes in the international system for public opinion on the need and the functions of the armed forces and the use of military force. The second question concerned the evidence for the ‘casualties hypothesis’ and the third concerned the interaction between public opinion and political decision

ALB

Führbar oder nicht? (Schritt II)ng history of, often intense, normative, theoretical and empirical debates. In the Age of Enlightenment, thinkers like Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau started to discuss democracy and its implications for policy-making. The debate has never stopped since then, and continues until today, albeit with varying degrees of intensity.

烦忧