找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Deleuze and Buddhism; Tony See,Joff Bradley Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 poststructuralism.deleuze.buddh

[复制链接]
楼主: 明显
发表于 2025-3-23 10:50:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 15:52:17 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-16104-2s is why Buddhism proves useful, in that it is principally directed to self-conceptions and personal practice. My intention is not to belittle those whom I claim to have mistaken Deleuze, but to try to care for them: “The ultimate answer to neurotic dependencies on professionals is mutual self-care” (Seem 1983, p. xxii).
发表于 2025-3-23 19:03:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:12:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 03:52:34 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 10:16:11 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 13:26:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 16:25:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:03:53 | 显示全部楼层
,Deleuze, Spinoza and the Question of Reincarnation in the Mahāyāna Tradition,ts to avoid suffering, what I aim to develop in this paper is a secular foundation to the concept of reincarnation that is consistent with the different ways in which this concept is understood across a number of Buddhist traditions, drawing in particular upon the doctrinal understanding of reincarn
发表于 2025-3-25 01:12:58 | 显示全部楼层
Ango the Schizo: Deleuze, Daraku, Downgoing,orth designated by his nom de plume. Ango. His BwO will be informed through an interpretation of “decadence”—and read in the light of Deleuze and Guattari and Nietzsche. The purpose of this is twofold. First, in order to understand Ango’s heterodox interpretation of decadence vis-à-vis Buddhist thou
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-19 18:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表